Author Topic: Mulligan?  (Read 2213 times)

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Mulligan?
« on: July 19, 2009, 03:38:10 PM »
0
Hey, everyone:

A friend of mine (who used to play Magic: The Gathering) was wondering if you can mulligan in Redemption?

For those unfamiliar with what a mulligan is, it is derived from golf. A mulligan is basically a "do-over" (you re-take your shot). In Magic: The Gathering, you can choose to take a mulligan if you draw no lands (or no manna) to begin your turn. You shuffle your hand back into your deck, but you draw one less card when you re-draw your hand.

My guess would be that no mulligan is allowed. To me, the only reason I can see even wanting to consider a mulligan is if you draw a Lost Soul and no evil characters to defend it, should your opponent make a rescue attempt. But he wants to know if he can mulligan if he doesn't like his opening hand.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2009, 03:56:43 PM »
0
No, this tactic is never used in Redemption, although it would be very fun to adopt.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2009, 04:53:49 PM »
0
It was discussed a long time ago, and decided that Redemption was fine without mulligans.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline bmc25

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 407
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2009, 04:56:18 PM »
0
+1 no mulligans!
Benjamin Campbell

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2009, 05:23:04 PM »
0
This was discussed about this time last year, but most people thought that there were better options, like the "intro-prep" phase and the "2nd player draws 3" rule.

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2009, 07:34:56 PM »
0
What's the "intro-prep" phase?

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2009, 10:24:04 PM »
0
What's the "intro-prep" phase?
Basically, just that each player gets to do whatever they would like to do during a prep phase after the initial draw 8 and before the first turn.  This could include putting down a fortress, activating an artifact, putting a LS in a site, putting a character in territory and putting a WC enh on them.

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #7 on: July 21, 2009, 03:00:11 AM »
0
Wow. So you mean that whomever goes first, during their preparation phase both players can play cards to their territory?

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #8 on: July 21, 2009, 07:08:46 AM »
0
No, it means both players set up their territory before the first turn begins.  Although since there's no draw on the first turn and the player is not likely to do anything on his real first prep phase, there's not much difference between the two ideas.

Offline Kevin Shride

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • I'm a good man, Charlie Brown!
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #9 on: July 21, 2009, 07:37:25 AM »
0
Keep in mind that these are just ideas, and none of these have been implemented yet.

Kevin Shride

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #10 on: July 21, 2009, 10:29:56 AM »
0
Keep in mind that these are just [really terriffic] ideas, and none of these have been implemented yet [but we're really hoping they will be in the next rulebook].
Fixed :)

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #11 on: July 21, 2009, 10:45:48 AM »
0
Keep in mind that these are just [really terriffic] ideas, and none of these have been implemented yet [but we're really hoping they will be in the next rulebook].
Fixed :)
See what I mean about the Prof's Jedi mind tricks?  ;)

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #12 on: July 21, 2009, 04:16:49 PM »
0
Awesome.

But wait, I thought the "second player draws three" rule has already been implemented. I could swear those were the rules at last year's Regionals.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Mulligan?
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2009, 04:17:59 PM »
0
It should have been implemented three years ago, but so far it officially has yet to be.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal