« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Indirect Negating  (Read 1205 times)

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Indirect Negating
« on: April 03, 2010, 10:27:49 PM »
0
ok, so I'm still confused on this. so my opponent rescues with Claudia banded to ET and plays Reach (nothing more). I block with Complainers and negate the special abilities. is Reach negated?
Logged

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Indirect Negating
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2010, 11:15:10 PM »
0
I think the answer to this is no, but I think that hearing a professional explanation could clear a few things up in my mind as well.
Logged
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Indirect Negating
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2010, 11:36:50 PM »
0
found what I needed.
Quote from: Professoralstad on March 31, 2010, 12:16:12 PM
Yes. Negates cascade. Negating a band negates the fact that the character was in battle (unless the second character is the one negating the banding, like Jacob to TSA, to avoid infinite loops). So Jacob+Captain blocked by TFG results in Jacob vs. TFG with no FBTN.
Quote from: Professoralstad on March 31, 2010, 12:26:54 PM
The ability to play an enhancement cannot be interrupted. So even if it were the regular AoC, it would not be negated by TFG coming into battle, but since ET would leave the battle, it would be discarded.
Logged

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Indirect Negating
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2010, 12:01:11 AM »
0
Negates cascade.  Negating ET's ability would negate Reach as ET's ability never activated.  If ET had played Reach due to normal #s init, it would not be negated.

Basically, if Ability A allows Ability B to be played via SA, and if Ability A is negated, Ability B is also negated because it was "never played".
Logged

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Indirect Negating
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2010, 03:44:58 AM »
0
False.
Logged
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Indirect Negating
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2010, 09:14:31 AM »
0
Quote from: Cameron the Conqueror on April 05, 2010, 12:01:11 AM
Negates cascade.  Negating ET's ability would negate Reach as ET's ability never activated.  If ET had played Reach due to normal #s init, it would not be negated.

That's usually true, except the ability to play an enhancement cannot be interrupted, so neither is Reach. However, it would be discarded since ET is kicked out of battle by negating the band.

The only way Reach can be negated in this situation is direct negation (i.e. if you blocked with King of Tyrus, or with Goliath and played Foolish Advice, Devourer, etc.)
Logged
Press 1 for more options.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal