Cactus Web Site special offer: Orders over $75 will receive a free Angel of God 2023 National Promo card while supplies last.
This one is interesting, but I would rule that whatever defeated him (generally) happens. This is, IMO, different from the ruling that Assyrian Survivor is an instead. In that case, Survivor refers to the act of defeating. In this case, Nabal refers to the ending of the battle. That is the only time that the 'instead' on his ability works.If he is removed from battle before it 'ends' then he cannot be targeted by this discard. However, if he is still in play when the battle ends, then his ability discards him.
Thanks to all so far!Quote from: Redoubter on June 02, 2014, 06:09:58 PMThis one is interesting, but I would rule that whatever defeated him (generally) happens. This is, IMO, different from the ruling that Assyrian Survivor is an instead. In that case, Survivor refers to the act of defeating. In this case, Nabal refers to the ending of the battle. That is the only time that the 'instead' on his ability works.If he is removed from battle before it 'ends' then he cannot be targeted by this discard. However, if he is still in play when the battle ends, then his ability discards him.Need to check this "instead"-thing, didn't get a clue out of it yet referring this situation.I understand your point. But in this case he is underdecked and he was the only EC in battle. So does underdecking him end the battle then? If so I'd like to raise my question again.
