« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Mimicking confusion?  (Read 1326 times)

slugfencer

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Mimicking confusion?
« on: July 31, 2016, 10:22:11 PM »
0
New confusion=Name a card (except LS). remove confusion from the game to remove all copies of the named card in a players deck, discard pile and hand from the game.
Mimicking miracles=If used by a magician, you may copy the special ability on an enhancement until the end o turn.

Can mimicking miracles copy confusion? If so, how would you play it?

Thanks!
Logged

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Mimicking confusion?
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2016, 10:34:40 PM »
+1
Because MM only copies the special ability (and not the name) you cannot fulfill the cost of "remove Confusion" to gain the benefit. This was something we did intentionally because we didn't want (additional) shenanigans with Confusion...  8)
Logged
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

slugfencer

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Mimicking confusion?
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2016, 11:17:21 PM »
0
Ok that makes sense.  That would've  been a  deck destroyer in t2.
Logged

Offline ChristianSoldier

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Mimicking confusion?
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2016, 01:19:30 AM »
0
Could you put Confusion in Storehouse, then use Mimicking Miracles to copy it, and remove the Confusion in your Storehouse from the game to activate it?

If yes, could you then do a similar thing by removing a Prophets Confusion from the game with the Cloud of Witnesses Confusion?
Logged
If you are reading this signature, thank a physicist.

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Mimicking confusion?
« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2016, 02:54:29 AM »
+1
No. When a card refers to itself by name, it is referring to that copy of the card. Another example would be trying to discard an opponent's Uzzah with your own Uzzah.
Logged
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Master Q

  • Trade Count: (+65)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Onward...
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Mimicking confusion?
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2016, 12:11:14 PM »
+3
But could you copy Confusion to name a card? ::)
Worth it.

Logged
If you were to go on a trip... where would you like to go?

Offline ChristianSoldier

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Mimicking confusion?
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2016, 05:11:35 PM »
0
Quote from: The Guardian on August 01, 2016, 02:54:29 AM
No. When a card refers to itself by name, it is referring to that copy of the card. Another example would be trying to discard an opponent's Uzzah with your own Uzzah.

I thought that might be the case, but I just wasn't entirely sure. Thanks.
Logged
If you are reading this signature, thank a physicist.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal