New Redemption Grab Bag now includes an assortment of 500 cards from five (5) different expansion sets. Available at Cactus website.
but an infinitley reccurrable CBN battle winner is way OP and EVERYONE here knows it.
OK, starting a second thread after the first has been firmly ruled upon is uncalled for. You arent changing anything you are only stirring the pot. Second, is it possible that the reference was left off of the card for this very reason? ( or better yet, that Matthew was worded in such a way as to make it impossible for him to reccur AoCP?)It has been established that the verse in the reg was added only as a refference and does not change the playability of the card in anyway. Cards are what they are at face value unless they have an erratta or a Play as...this one has neither that is applicable to your issue. THe card simply does not work that way, and for one I applaud the playttesters for closing that loop. Use AoC and take your chances that it can be negated, but an infinitley reccurrable CBN battle winner is way OP and EVERYONE here knows it.So please just let this one drop...or better yet, delete the thread because this is only going to end badly.
Quote from: crustpope on August 23, 2010, 10:53:51 AMbut an infinitley reccurrable CBN battle winner is way OP and EVERYONE here knows it.Every other combo that can recur CBN battle winners every turn including AoCp says hi.
I'm not clear on what else remains unresolved on the issue or what about the issue causes a problem for the entire game.
Alright, Im calling you out. Give me an INFINTELY reccurable CBN battle winner combo. bonus points if you can do it with AOCP.
Quote from: Smokey on August 23, 2010, 10:56:17 AMQuote from: crustpope on August 23, 2010, 10:53:51 AMbut an infinitley reccurrable CBN battle winner is way OP and EVERYONE here knows it.Every other combo that can recur CBN battle winners every turn including AoCp says hi. Alright, Im calling you out. Give me an INFINTELY reccurable CBN battle winner combo. bonus points if you can do it with AOCP.
All I'm asking is why it was ruled however many years ago that the cards without a printed reference just wouldn't have a reference.
Second, they could have given the referenceless cards references and then simply worded new cards (like Matthew) differently to prevent such things.
Also, since there are still five pages of discussion in the locked thread, it also does not make sense to accuse people of deleting posts that don't agree with the ruling. There are a lot of those posts still in place. So logically, there had to be another reason for that.
king lemuel/zeal. another infinitely recurrable cbn battle winner.
Quote from: Master KChief on August 23, 2010, 11:14:18 AMking lemuel/zeal. another infinitely recurrable cbn battle winner.Nope, not infinite, you have to sacrifice a card from hand to recurr AoCP. THis well will eventually run dry.
Quote from: crustpope on August 23, 2010, 11:33:24 AMQuote from: Master KChief on August 23, 2010, 11:14:18 AMking lemuel/zeal. another infinitely recurrable cbn battle winner.Nope, not infinite, you have to sacrifice a card from hand to recurr AoCP. THis well will eventually run dry.Gather lemmuel to ET and use philosophy, also Gleaning the Fields lets your recur any good enhancement your opponent is using.
Quote from: The Schaef on August 23, 2010, 11:21:15 AMAlso, since there are still five pages of discussion in the locked thread, it also does not make sense to accuse people of deleting posts that don't agree with the ruling. There are a lot of those posts still in place. So logically, there had to be another reason for that.I never claimed to know why the posts were deleted, I just took note of other people complaining in the Off-Topic section thread that there posts had been deleted rather than answered. If whoever deleted them had a valid reason, then they could/should have said that in the thread so that the people knew why their posts had been deleted.