Author Topic: MAJOR RULE CHANGES - In effect NOW. Tell everyone! (Read 40625 times)

theselfevident · « **Reply #175 on:** March 18, 2012, 03:06:09 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on March 18, 2012, 03:01:33 PM

I think we're missing the biggest change with these rules: March Madness. How will this change our eventual winner? Will early dropouts complain that they could have won? With this become a scandal, forever slandering the eventual winner's trophy?

Forever marred with an asterisks next to their name... Barrigate all over again? NOOOOOO!!!

Bobbert · « **Reply #176 on:** March 19, 2012, 09:09:05 PM »

I go for one weekend without internet access...

1. Okay. I can live with it.

2. Umm... As was already mentioned, are we actually wanting to limit Jesus' power? I remember a discussion earlier this season/end of last season about the new starter deck having a SoG that says "Negate and rescue an LS" so that it could rescue NT and */4, at least partially so that we weren't sending the message "God can't save that." NJ I'm fine with (goodbye chump block...), but I think SoG should still be able to.

3. No. I especially dislike the optional part. If it's everywhere, fine, I can deal with it, but I don't like having to possibly change my legal deck to play in a tournament.

4.

FTM, goodbye and good riddance!

Sadness · « **Reply #177 on:** March 20, 2012, 08:58:35 AM »

I like rule #1.

Rule #2 is okay.

Rule #3-will it be optional? One tour one month goes restricted,next month its unrestriced.

Rule #4 it should be no doms played in the first round,not just restricted to Mayhem.

Just my 2 cents.

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #178 on:** March 20, 2012, 09:05:44 AM »

My new version of the original Rule #4:

No dominants can be played in the first round, nor can they be used to end a game (the last round).

Red · « **Reply #179 on:** March 20, 2012, 01:42:27 PM »

ATTENTION!!

In case anyone missed it Rule #4 is no longer a rule and was replaced by an errata to Mayhem.

CountFount · « **Reply #180 on:** March 20, 2012, 02:50:57 PM »

Rule #5: If you are playing someone over 40 you are restricted from rescuing lost souls unless you are over 40. No Gabe, Age not IQ.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #181 on:** March 20, 2012, 02:55:04 PM »

Quote from: CountFount on March 20, 2012, 02:50:57 PM

Rule #5: If you are playing someone over 40 you are restricted from rescuing lost souls unless you are over 40. No Gabe, Age not IQ.

I'd still find a way to beat you. Not sure how, but I would.

Master KChief · « **Reply #182 on:** March 20, 2012, 02:55:55 PM »

Just like Type A, we need a category for just senior citizens. Type Z?

STAMP · « **Reply #183 on:** March 20, 2012, 02:57:28 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on March 20, 2012, 02:55:55 PM

Just like Type A, we need a category for just senior citizens. Type Z?

Type AARP

lp670sv · « **Reply #184 on:** March 20, 2012, 02:58:53 PM »

This thread just got really funny

CountFount · « **Reply #185 on:** March 20, 2012, 03:23:11 PM »

All of you are now in "THE BOOK". Beware of dark corners and large fat guys.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #186 on:** March 20, 2012, 03:26:01 PM »

Quote from: CountFount on March 20, 2012, 03:23:11 PM

All of you are now in "THE BOOK". Beware of dark corners and large fat guys.

The Lard's Book of Strife?

theselfevident · « **Reply #187 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:24:50 PM »

I think there should be some sort of deck out rule.

Soundman2 · « **Reply #188 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:40:18 PM »

Quote from: theselfevident on March 20, 2012, 04:24:50 PM

I think there should be some sort of deck out rule.

NO that would make the game just dumb!

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #189 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:41:55 PM »

Quote from: theselfevident on March 20, 2012, 04:24:50 PM

I think there should be some sort of deck out rule.

I've agreed with this for a while now. Nothing too extreme, but something to discourage speed all the same.

Master KChief · « **Reply #190 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:43:17 PM »

Deck out, you lose the game. Is that too extreme?

Wings of Music · « **Reply #191 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:43:59 PM »

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #192 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:44:09 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on March 20, 2012, 04:43:17 PM

Deck out, you lose the game. Is that too extreme?

Not really extreme enough. Deck out, you get a tat.

CountFount · « **Reply #193 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:46:04 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on March 20, 2012, 04:43:17 PM

Deck out, you lose the game. Is that too extreme?

I can see it now, 2013 rule change shorten game to 10 minutes.

Master KChief · « **Reply #194 on:** March 20, 2012, 04:47:27 PM »

That wouldn't be so bad, now we can play with best 2 of 3.

Lampy 2.0 · « **Reply #195 on:** March 20, 2012, 05:02:26 PM »

There are very few times I have ever played a CCG and had my deck run out. So this penalty never bothered me. (But I actually ran a mill deck in Yu-Gi-Oh! with satisfying results.) I wish this had the "reshuffle your discard pile when it runs out" rule. One of the few elements of "Victory at Hebron" that would work in the main game...

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #196 on:** March 20, 2012, 05:21:27 PM »

Barren Wasteland
If opponent tries to draw a card and can't, you may discard a hero.

CountFount · « **Reply #197 on:** March 20, 2012, 05:23:16 PM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on March 20, 2012, 05:21:27 PM

Barren Wasteland
If opponent tries to draw a card and can't, you may discard a hero.

errata:... or opponent

theselfevident · « **Reply #198 on:** March 20, 2012, 05:38:36 PM »

Rule proposal:
If a player has no remaining cards in their deck before their draw phase, their heroes may not enter battle. Once there are no cards remaining in all draw piles, game ends.

or

[Edit]

If a player decks out, increase the number of redeemed souls required to win to 6 for that player.

or

If a player decks out, player must *discard (*place on deck maybe?) one of their own cards from their territory for each turn they are without a card in their draw pile at the beginning of their turn.

Wings of Music · « **Reply #199 on:** March 20, 2012, 05:56:46 PM »

nah that's a little too stringent, it would necessitate 63-70 card decks.

EDIT:

Perhaps have something like,

If a player has no cards in deck opponents of that player may draw an extra card during their draw phases for each turn player has had no cards in deck.

I think that this would be a little bit better, it would really help turtles from losing due to time-outs methinks.

News:

Author Topic: MAJOR RULE CHANGES - In effect NOW. Tell everyone! (Read 40625 times)

Chronic Apathy

Chronic Apathy