Author Topic: Long Day  (Read 8409 times)

Offline Lawfuldog

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2266
  • Hearthstone Semi-Pro
    • -
    • South Central Region
Long Day
« on: July 18, 2009, 07:24:19 AM »
0
Quick question.

If I rescue attempt with a unique hero, play Long Day then Stillness, can I make another rescue attempt with the same hero.
Booster Draft king once upon a time.

Offline Kevin Shride

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • I'm a good man, Charlie Brown!
Re: Long Day
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2009, 07:26:26 AM »
0
Yes.  It's a different battle, so you can use the same Hero again.

Kevin Shride

Offline LukeSnyder

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 786
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2009, 03:39:13 PM »
0
Yes.  It's a different battle, so you can use the same Hero again.

Kevin Shride

•      If a character is forced to withdraw (e.g., Darkness (Warriors)) or withdraws from a battle voluntarily (e.g., Highway), it may not re-enter the current battle (see Withdraw in the glossary of the rulebook [p. 54]).  Moreover, the character may enter on a new battle on the same turn (e.g., The Long Day).

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Long Day
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2009, 12:15:45 AM »
0
I'm going to shoot myself in the foot here and say that no you can't.

Look at the REG quote - The word Moreover would not be used to set up a counter-point, English Syntax simply doesn't allow it, proper syntax would be However. Add the word 'not' between 'may' and 'enter' in that sentence and re-read it. Does it make more sense that way? It is a simple typo putting things into the REG. If this is not the case and you can re-enter battle I am so playing Type 2 at Natz.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2009, 02:00:14 AM by Red Dragon Thorn »
www.covenantgames.com

Offline Captain Kirk

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3835
  • Combo? Yes please.
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2009, 09:13:43 AM »
0
There were two other big threads in recent months where this came up.  Both Schaef and Bryon posted that they believed the 2nd quote is missing the word "not."  This will be addressed in the new REG and I wouldnt' risk it working at nationals, since it will probably end up being ruled the way Schaef and Bryon think.

Kirk
Friends don't let friends play T1 multi.

Offline Kevin Shride

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • I'm a good man, Charlie Brown!
Re: Long Day
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2009, 09:29:33 AM »
0
It has always been my understanding that a character may not reenter battle during the same battle, but may enter any different battle, even on the same turn.  For instance, if you are forced pre-block to fight two evil characters, you may still use the winning evil character to block the rescue, because it is a different battle.  The same logic applies to The Long Day.

Kevin Shride

Offline Bryon

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4821
  • Dare to Tread into the Dawn
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Redemption California
Re: Long Day
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2009, 02:45:17 PM »
0
It was my understanding that a hero cannot reenter battle on the same TURN.

Offline Kevin Shride

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • I'm a good man, Charlie Brown!
Re: Long Day
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2009, 05:04:14 PM »
0
So, Bryon, if my opponent forces two of my Evil Characters to fight pre-block, I cannot block the rescue with either of those?

Kevin Shride

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2009, 10:33:31 PM »
0
I am positive that at some point in the recent past it was ruled that The Long Day allowed the same character that was in the last battle to enter the new battle; this exception is actually stated in the REG:
Quote from: REG
•      If a character is forced to withdraw (e.g., Darkness (Warriors)) or withdraws from a battle voluntarily (e.g., Highway), it may not re-enter the current battle (see Withdraw in the glossary of the rulebook [p. 54]).  Moreover, the character may enter on a new battle on the same turn (e.g., The Long Day).
I think this will be changed sometime soon though, due to broken combos.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline redemption99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2907
  • God's Beautiful Creation
    • Unleavened Bread Ministries
Re: Long Day
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2009, 11:22:38 PM »
0
So, Bryon, if my opponent forces two of my Evil Characters to fight pre-block, I cannot block the rescue with either of those?

Kevin Shride

If this ends up being tru i think claudia/ET+Cup of Wrath would see a lot more play.
~Chris

"Trust in the Lord and He shall guide your ways."

The End IS Near

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2009, 11:44:26 PM »
0
Or Hidden Treasures; however, the REG quote only applies to withdrawing from battle, which isn't the case here. And even if it did apply to this, the bolded part would still take effect, so I really don't think this works.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline Lawfuldog

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2266
  • Hearthstone Semi-Pro
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2009, 04:19:03 PM »
0
In my opinion, if the REG states something, then it should be played that way. It shouldn't matter if someone else says it, the rules state a fact and should not be changed due to someone saying something else. If this game's rules were constantly open to change because something may seem broken, then it would give new players a hard time understanding rules. I'm sure others would agree with me.

I think it should be played the way the REG says, change the REG, and then I will play it that way.
Booster Draft king once upon a time.

Offline Bryon

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4821
  • Dare to Tread into the Dawn
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Redemption California
Re: Long Day
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2009, 04:20:57 PM »
0
It was my understanding that this only referred to withdrawing from battle.  If you are captured by an opponent, and then released by anther card, you can be banded back in by yet another card.  Same thing with an ended side battle.  If you complete the side battle without withdrawing, then you can still join a main battle.

Offline Kevin Shride

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 284
  • I'm a good man, Charlie Brown!
Re: Long Day
« Reply #13 on: July 21, 2009, 07:35:50 AM »
0
After talking to Bryon on the phone last night, it was clarified that a character that WITHDRAWS from battle may not reenter battle on that same turn, no matter how many battles take place.  A character who leaves battle in any other manner may not reenter the SAME battle that turn, but may reenter a DIFFERENT battle on the same turn.

So, if you make two EC's fight pre-block, one of them may still block the rescue, assuming that EC didn't withdraw from the side battle.

If you play The Long Day and withdraw from a battle, that character may not reenter the subsequent rescue attempt on the same turn.

If you play The Long Day and lose by stalemate, for example, that same character may begin the second rescue attempt.

Kevin Shride

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #14 on: July 21, 2009, 09:56:32 AM »
0
No, that isn't even close to what the REG says. Just read that quote, it's self-explanatory; it even singles out the example of The Long Day.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Long Day
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2009, 10:12:06 AM »
0
No, that isn't even close to what the REG says. Just read that quote, it's self-explanatory; it even singles out the example of The Long Day.

Hey, Jeremy, Bryon and Kevin are playtesters.  If they agree on somethings that's about as good as hearing it from Rob himself.  They tend to know what they're talking about.  If something they said doesn't jive with what you see in the REG then maybe their explanation (or the REG) needs better clarification.  What exactly do you think "isn't even close to what the REG says"?
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #16 on: July 21, 2009, 10:44:32 AM »
0
I'm sorry, you're right. I was just being a jerk. :-[

It's just that this quote...
Quote from: REG
•      If a character is forced to withdraw (e.g., Darkness (Warriors)) or withdraws from a battle voluntarily (e.g., Highway), it may not re-enter the current battle (see Withdraw in the glossary of the rulebook [p. 54]).  Moreover, the character may enter on a new battle on the same turn (e.g., The Long Day).
...seems to explicitly state that if a character withdraws from battle he can still enter a new battle on the same turn, whereas Kevin and Bryon are saying...
If you play The Long Day and withdraw from a battle, that character may not reenter the subsequent rescue attempt on the same turn.
...which is exactly the opposite of what the REG says. :-\
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2009, 10:55:19 AM »
0
I would propose that two heroes or ECs that fight each other to a stalemate are both considered withdrawing.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline Captain Kirk

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3835
  • Combo? Yes please.
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #18 on: July 21, 2009, 11:16:16 AM »
0
That is bad, otherwise Hidden Treasures + Sword of the Lord can keep your opponent from block with two of his characters.

Kirk
Friends don't let friends play T1 multi.

Offline Bryon

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4821
  • Dare to Tread into the Dawn
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Redemption California
Re: Long Day
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2009, 11:24:37 AM »
0
The REG quote is missing a very important word: NOT.  Fixed below.

•      If a character is forced to withdraw (e.g., Darkness (Warriors)) or withdraws from a battle voluntarily (e.g., Highway), it may not re-enter the current battle (see Withdraw in the glossary of the rulebook [p. 54]).  Moreover, the character may NOT enter on a new battle on the same turn (e.g., The Long Day).

The "Moreover" is a clue that the following phrase will contain an example of the rule, not a counterexample of the rule.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #20 on: July 21, 2009, 11:31:51 AM »
0
Wow, I'm really, really sorry; I was confused. That one word completely reverses the meaning of that clause.

This principle still applies only to withdrawing though, right? And withdraw is an ability, which means someone has to play a withdraw card for that to apply...right?
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #21 on: July 21, 2009, 12:37:36 PM »
0
That is bad, otherwise Hidden Treasures + Sword of the Lord can keep your opponent from block with two of his characters.

Kirk

But it is common sense.  If two characters are fighting a stalemate, and both do not do anything else to win the battle, then they are essentially withdrawing.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #22 on: July 21, 2009, 12:49:33 PM »
0
Essentially, using non-Redemption terms...
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Long Day
« Reply #23 on: July 21, 2009, 01:25:34 PM »
0
Essentially, using non-Redemption terms...

Not really.  It's a game rule.  Just as characters who are */0 or less at the end of battle are discarded, characters who were not defeated withdraw to territory.

Quote from: The Official Redemption Rulebook
Redemption® Rulebook > Diagram of a Turn > Battle Resolution
Stalemate
The rescue attempt ends in a stalemate if neither the Hero(es) nor the Evil Character(s) have enough strength to defeat the other. Both the Hero(es)and the Evil Character(s) withdraw to their respective territories. All enhancements played during the Battle Phase (except set-aside or weapon-class enhancements, or cards placed on other cards during battle) are discarded. No Lost Soul is rescued. This is considered a defeat of the Hero since the Hero was unable to make a successful rescue.


And now that I found that little tidbit, y'all better put Pot O' Manna in your T2 decks for Nats.   :)
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Long Day
« Reply #24 on: July 21, 2009, 02:14:36 PM »
0
Pot O' Manna has been in my Type 2 deck for years.
www.covenantgames.com

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal