Author Topic: Unsuccessful  (Read 1253 times)

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Unsuccessful
« on: June 28, 2017, 03:30:57 AM »
+1
In light of a recent thread that discussed wording on artifacts that made the ability either upon activation, at any time or each round, what is the situation with Unsuccessful's wording? I have always played this curse as an "At any time" ability vs having to be used upon activation. I believe this card was meant to be used at any time in battle , as Covenant of Noah is (errated). I want to verify with the elders if Unsuccessful is to be treated like errated Covenant of Noah.

Thanks

Unsuccessful: "Negate the last good enhancement played in battle (may be used once)."
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Unsuccessful
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2017, 05:44:18 PM »
0
Bump
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Unsuccessful
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2017, 10:37:47 AM »
0
Bump
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline Master Q

  • Trade Count: (+65)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Onward...
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Unsuccessful
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2017, 12:03:01 PM »
0
I have always played this curse as an "At any time" ability vs having to be used upon activation. I believe this card was meant to be used at any time in battle , as Covenant of Noah is (errated). I want to verify with the elders if Unsuccessful is to be treated like errated Covenant of Noah.


I haven't seen this card played in a long time, but every time I've seen it it's been played like Cov o' Noah. If you were to play it in a tournament against me to negate a good enhancement during battle, I wouldn't question it, as that's how I would play it. If it's not errata'd to work like that, it should be.
If you were to go on a trip... where would you like to go?

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Unsuccessful
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2017, 12:23:44 PM »
0
I have a vague recollection of the Elder team discussing this card and the consensus seemed to be it should be given errata similar to Covenant of Noah. However, it was never added to the official errata list--I'm not sure why. I will confer with others and see if they have similar recollections.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Adevine

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Unsuccessful
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2017, 12:31:43 PM »
0
Sorry, to ask a noob question but is there a list of erreta cards?  Or did I overlook it in the REG?

Offline Jeremystair

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 944
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
Re: Unsuccessful
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2017, 12:41:04 PM »
0
Sorry, to ask a noob question but is there a list of erreta cards?  Or did I overlook it in the REG?

Here is the list

http://www.cactusforums.com/redemption-official-rules/errata-reworded-special-abilities/

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Unsuccessful
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2017, 01:56:48 PM »
0
Cool thanks.
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal