New Redemption Grab Bag now includes an assortment of 500 cards from five (5) different expansion sets. Available at Cactus website.
With the kindness error card being a 1/1 hero instead of a 1/1 enhancement, is it possible to use it has a yellow brigade hero? Or would it not be tournament legal?
Imo, now that symbolic is a real thing, it should be a 1/1 gold symbolic character, just for fun.
Quote from: Sadness on May 10, 2018, 07:51:19 AMWith the kindness error card being a 1/1 hero instead of a 1/1 enhancement, is it possible to use it has a yellow brigade hero? Or would it not be tournament legal?Im not sure if it changed, but it didnt used to be tournament legal
Quote from: Ironisaac on May 10, 2018, 09:18:47 AMImo, now that symbolic is a real thing, it should be a 1/1 gold symbolic character, just for fun.I know there was talks about this at one point in time, but I don't think it ever went anywhere. Also with the rule changes to ignore, it isn't as strong as it used to be. So I don't see why we couldn't just let it be played as is.
Quote from: Crashfach2002 on May 10, 2018, 10:34:50 AMQuote from: Ironisaac on May 10, 2018, 09:18:47 AMImo, now that symbolic is a real thing, it should be a 1/1 gold symbolic character, just for fun.I know there was talks about this at one point in time, but I don't think it ever went anywhere. Also with the rule changes to ignore, it isn't as strong as it used to be. So I don't see why we couldn't just let it be played as is.I would think it would be a bad precedent to allow cards that are printed in error to be used erroneously. What if a "Son of God" card was printed with a "cross" icon instead of a "Lamb" icon? It was not the intention of the card to be used that way. Playing the card as the ORCID/errata seems to be the clearest fix.
Quote from: SEB on May 10, 2018, 10:56:39 AMQuote from: Crashfach2002 on May 10, 2018, 10:34:50 AMQuote from: Ironisaac on May 10, 2018, 09:18:47 AMImo, now that symbolic is a real thing, it should be a 1/1 gold symbolic character, just for fun.I know there was talks about this at one point in time, but I don't think it ever went anywhere. Also with the rule changes to ignore, it isn't as strong as it used to be. So I don't see why we couldn't just let it be played as is.I would think it would be a bad precedent to allow cards that are printed in error to be used erroneously. What if a "Son of God" card was printed with a "cross" icon instead of a "Lamb" icon? It was not the intention of the card to be used that way. Playing the card as the ORCID/errata seems to be the clearest fix.The precedent would basically allow this one card to be played. This is ultimately the only card that is considered an error that would have any play value. Also, assuming that a Son of God would be printed with a cross would mean that the elders and creator of this game didn't notice that rather not small detail. Not to mention they release all of their cards to the public, so I doubt that would ever happen. Ultimately it doesn't matter, because even if they allowed it to be a 1/1 Hero that ignores Gold, I'm not sure I would even play with it.
