« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Michael vs Somebody  (Read 3914 times)

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Michael vs Somebody
« on: November 07, 2008, 12:11:15 PM »
0
OK who plays first enhancement in this battle?

Micheal with Angel's Sword vs Somebody with Swift Horses

I'm almost 100% sure Micheal does, but I'm not clear on the why.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2008, 12:18:17 PM by SoulSaver »
Logged

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2008, 12:21:46 PM »
0
Michael does.  Swift Horses cannot interrupt Angel's Sword ability to play first when it's on Michael.
Logged
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2008, 12:24:25 PM »
0
Arg! I can't believe that I missed that! ::) Thanks Gabe for helping a guy with no brain today. :)
Logged

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2008, 01:57:16 PM »
0
However, Angels Sword on say... Arianna vs 2kh = EC plays first.
Logged

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2008, 03:11:44 PM »
0
Quote
However, Angels Sword on say... Arianna vs 2kh = EC plays first.

That's not quite right, Arianna gets to play first, but then 2khorses interrupts the previous enhancement played by Arianna and plays next.
Logged

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2008, 03:21:38 PM »
0
I would have to side with Lambo on this one.  :)
Logged
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2008, 03:21:59 PM »
0
No... I think lambo is right because Angel's sword is ongoing (Trigger) and ITB inturupts ongoing.
Logged
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2008, 03:41:42 PM »
0
Quote
No... I think lambo is right because Angel's sword is ongoing (Trigger) and ITB inturupts ongoing.

That makes sense.
Logged

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2008, 05:31:00 PM »
0
so what would happen in this situation?

Big banding chain of angels, ended with Arriana + Angels sword... vs one EC with 2kh.

2kh would interrupt and let the EC play next, but since the first enhancement has already been played, would the EC get to play another enh provided he was loosing by the numbers?
Logged

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2008, 05:37:54 PM »
0
The sword will kick back in after the 2KHorse play, and give init to Arianna et al.
Logged

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2008, 07:07:56 PM »
0
How does that work though? Angels sword says it gives them initiative to play the FIRST enhancement. One has already been played this battle, and AS doesnt say "you may play the first or second enhancement"

I would assume first means first.
Logged

Offline Egyptian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 284
  • Where are your Pharaohs?
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Life &c.
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2008, 03:42:59 PM »
0
By the way, everything said about Michael here is also true with Eli (NT 6/7 Silver) right? Since weapon class enhancements on Eli cannot be negated or discarded, correct?

I was thinking about adding Eli to my angel deck in case Michael bites the dust early in the game, for this reason.
Logged
Those who are merciful to the cruel will, in the end, be cruel to them that deserve mercy. -Midrash

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2008, 04:09:44 PM »
0
Quote from: Egyptian on November 10, 2008, 03:42:59 PM
By the way, everything said about Michael here is also true with Eli (NT 6/7 Silver) right? Since weapon class enhancements on Eli cannot be negated or discarded, correct?

I was thinking about adding Eli to my angel deck in case Michael bites the dust early in the game, for this reason.


Silly Egyptian...everyone knows that Angel Wars commons are completely useless... ::)
Logged
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Egyptian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 284
  • Where are your Pharaohs?
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Life &c.
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2008, 03:24:00 PM »
0
Sure of course... expect the unexpected.. :-D
Logged
Those who are merciful to the cruel will, in the end, be cruel to them that deserve mercy. -Midrash

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2008, 04:55:18 AM »
0
I think "first enhancement" is equivalent to "next enhancement", sort of like "second character" is equivalent to "additional character" on banding cards.
Logged

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Michael vs Somebody
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2008, 01:04:07 PM »
0
Quote from: RedemptionAggie on November 12, 2008, 04:55:18 AM
I think "first enhancement" is equivalent to "next enhancement", sort of like "second character" is equivalent to "additional character" on banding cards.
Hm I'd argue that but to my knowledge 1st = 1st.
Logged
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal