Author Topic: Bearing Bad News  (Read 699 times)

Offline Red Warrior

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • *****
  • Posts: 498
    • -
    • North Central Region
Bearing Bad News
« on: February 12, 2013, 01:49:54 AM »
0
What's our definition of "as a result of this battle?".

Let's say I block a large FBTN-B chain, so I'm pretty much set on initiative with my blocking Naaman. I play bearing bad news, then Strange Fire, discarding another EC in territory. Does the affect of Strange Fire interact correctly with the "as a result of battle" clause to trigger the protect clause?

Bearing Bad News
"If a unique human evil character is discarded as a result of this battle, no lost soul may be rescued by a hero this turn"
-Joey

Red was always playable :)

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Bearing Bad News
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2013, 09:53:54 AM »
0
Yep.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Bearing Bad News
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2013, 12:27:08 PM »
0
sounds like a 3 for 1 in this scenerio. He spends 1 card for your 3 cards gaining a block. O.k. really a 2 and a half to 1 but really if they are spending more cards than you then eventually it will be in your favor which doesnt sound good. What a more like Deluge of Rain?
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline Red Warrior

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • *****
  • Posts: 498
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Bearing Bad News
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2013, 03:42:22 PM »
0
RTS,
Let's just say this isn't the actual scenario, but it answers what I need for some T2 ideas... but that belongs in another discussion.
-Joey

Red was always playable :)

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal