Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
That's specifically limited by Ithamar MJB. The artifact is not.
Does Ithamar really need errata just because he doesn't work as intended?
Search deck for The Tabernacle and put it in play. If your The Tabernacle does not have an artifact on it, you may activate a Tabernacle Artifact on it.
"If your The Tabernacle" sounds funny, but I think the point is clear enough.
Ithamar creates confusion, and has him putting things into the Tabernacle that God did not allow. For those reasons, I vote for errata.
Quote from: Bryon on March 08, 2010, 12:56:40 PMIthamar creates confusion, and has him putting things into the Tabernacle that God did not allow. For those reasons, I vote for errata.Would Ithamar really create confusion if the ruling was simply to play the card as written (meaning "yes any artifact and yes any available The Tabernacle")?We know people brought all manner of illicit items into the various tabernacle/temples. Asherah Pole and Altar of Ahaz for example.
there is little reason to give Ithamar this controversial, counter-Biblical ability just so that Tabernacle priests get more help.
Perhaps banning the card is a better solution. That doesn't require errata or misunderstanding. Reprint it.Seriously, I don't care what the final ruling is as long as we all move on and end this thread. This one gives me a headache. Mike