Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
An official answer was given about The Tabernacle but not about identifiers in general though it seems to be implied. So I think asking for the reason why is important to understand if this rule just applies to The Tabernacle, is a rule about all temples, or some broader standard for identifiers. This has not been stated and while they are talking about a top down approach, the quote only talks about The Tabernacle. If it is a rule that identifiers inherently restrict what goes in by definition then will it ever be possible to have cards put Asherah Pole or others into Solomon's Temple?
The owner put it to sleep.
For what reason? It was a perfectly good horse as far as I could tell.
Quote from: YourMathTeacher on August 31, 2010, 05:46:23 PMThe owner put it to sleep.For what reason? It was a perfectly good horse as far as I could tell.
Quote from: Minister Polarius on August 27, 2010, 01:27:57 PMSA's override...Identifiers all the time.such as?
SA's override...Identifiers all the time.
Quote from: BubbleBoy on August 29, 2010, 06:42:47 PMPriestly Breastplate says it may be placed on a priest when you activate it. What if the priest says "Holds one Tabernacle Artifact" in the identifier line? Is it not able to hold Priestly Breastplate then?I didn't think characters had/could have Holds abilities....
Priestly Breastplate says it may be placed on a priest when you activate it. What if the priest says "Holds one Tabernacle Artifact" in the identifier line? Is it not able to hold Priestly Breastplate then?