« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: ITB the site?  (Read 3390 times)

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
ITB the site?
« on: March 11, 2009, 03:25:12 PM »
0
Senario

R.a. Mike with NJ, blocked by nerg. If nerg played dream then mask of vanity would mike still have the ability of acsess from the site?

New Jerusalem: Hero has site acsess

Dream: Interrupt the battle, Draw three, play next enhancement.

Mask of vanity: Discard one site

Sites are placed in battle for acsess.
Logged
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2009, 03:28:17 PM »
0
The lack of the Site causes the Hero to lose the access-from-having-a-Site-in-battle.  But the special ability gives the Hero access for the remainder of the battle.
Logged

Offline soul seeker

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3011
  • I find your lack of faith disturbing.
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2009, 03:41:35 PM »
0
Even if it is interrupted?

How is demonic blockade different than this scenario?  Is it because it mentions the site by name?
Logged
noob with a medal

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2009, 03:47:27 PM »
0
How is it interrupted?

And yes, Demonic Blockade negates Sites because it says that it negates Sites.
Logged

Offline soul seeker

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3011
  • I find your lack of faith disturbing.
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2009, 03:56:29 PM »
0
Quote from: The Schaef on March 11, 2009, 03:47:27 PM
How is it interrupted?

And yes, Demonic Blockade negates Sites because it says that it negates Sites.
It says interrupt the battle...I assumed that NJ site was a part of said battle.
  The Demonic Blockade answer helps clarify things a bit.
Logged
noob with a medal

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2009, 03:59:08 PM »
0
ITB interrupts characters and enhancements only.
Logged
My wife is a hottie.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2009, 04:05:49 PM »
0
I agree with YMT and Schaef.  Somewhere in the REG is actually says that ITB doesn't interrupt sites.
Logged
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2009, 04:12:15 PM »
0
Just for reference:

Instant Abilities -> Interrupt or Negate Last -> How to Use

‘Interrupt the battle’ interrupts all active ongoing abilities on characters and enhancements (e.g. Red Dragon), abilities that are causing you to lose the battle by removal (e.g. King Zimri), as well as the last enhancement played in the current battle if it was played by your opponent.  Interrupting the battle interrupts the battle flow at the point where you played the interrupt.  It does not send you back to the beginning of the battle and does not include special abilities completed prior to the interrupt being played that are no longer pending.

Logged
My wife is a hottie.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2009, 05:51:58 PM »
0
I guess that makes sense. I forgot ITB doesn't include all cards in battle.
Logged
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline galadgawyn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #9 on: March 14, 2009, 10:41:08 AM »
0
That is the correct ruling for how things are.

 I've heard a few people discuss whether that is how the rule SHOULD be.  I think it would be an appropriate rule change to say Interrupt the Battle interrupts all ongoing abilities in battle.  I think that is a more intuitive rule and how I've seen many people assume it works.  If a card is placed in battle then it faces the risk of whatever affects that battle; if you discard or remove all cards in battle then the site or artifact is discarded/removed.  So make ITB consistent with those rulings.
Logged

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #10 on: March 14, 2009, 12:07:31 PM »
0
Quote from: galadgawyn on March 14, 2009, 10:41:08 AM
That is the correct ruling for how things are.

 I've heard a few people discuss whether that is how the rule SHOULD be.  I think it would be an appropriate rule change to say Interrupt the Battle interrupts all ongoing abilities in battle.  I think that is a more intuitive rule and how I've seen many people assume it works.  If a card is placed in battle then it faces the risk of whatever affects that battle; if you discard or remove all cards in battle then the site or artifact is discarded/removed.  So make ITB consistent with those rulings.

I agree with the above wholeheartedly. Interrupt the Battle means Interrupt the Battle, not Interrupt Half the Battle.
Logged

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #11 on: March 14, 2009, 01:19:04 PM »
0
Agreed. Artifacts can be in battle now, why would they not be interrupted? They are ongoing. +1
Logged
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #12 on: March 14, 2009, 01:20:37 PM »
0
+1 too.  What arts can be in battle besides Priestly Breastplate?
Logged

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #13 on: March 14, 2009, 01:23:22 PM »
0
Crossbeams.
Logged
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline MichaelHue

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2655
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #14 on: March 14, 2009, 03:27:27 PM »
0
I like the idea of interrupting site abilities. +1
Logged
¿ʇnʍlol
Quote from: The Schaef
I'm just proud to see TKP all growed up and pwning trollz :tear:

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #15 on: March 14, 2009, 03:33:58 PM »
0
Say the rule was changed.  If say Promised Land was interrupted, would that then count toward one of its uses?  If it would, then this change should not be made because it would be so OPd.  If it didn't, then I think it might be able to be changed.  +1
Logged

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2009, 03:43:44 PM »
0
I didn't even know that you couldn't interrupt sites. :-\ As long as we're voting, I'll throw my hand up for I-T-B-able sites.
Logged
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ITB the site?
« Reply #17 on: March 14, 2009, 04:10:14 PM »
0
Quote from: Cameron the Conqueror on March 14, 2009, 03:33:58 PM
Say the rule was changed.  If say Promised Land was interrupted, would that then count toward one of its uses? 

Just interrupting the site would not stop the RA. The initial scenario had the interrupt followed by discarding the site. If the site is not discarded, then it would reactivate after the interrupt or still allow access strictly by color. This would have no changed effect on its number of uses. If it was discarded, then the number of uses would be irrelevent.
Logged
My wife is a hottie.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal