Author Topic: Separate question on the two proposed rule changes  (Read 645 times)

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Separate question on the two proposed rule changes
« on: September 13, 2011, 10:32:57 PM »
0
Did the set that was just released anticipate these rule changes?  I'm wondering how long the playtesters have been considering these changes, and if those ideas were incorporated in some of the more recent cards.  If this was answered in the other threads already I apologize.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Separate question on the two proposed rule changes
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2011, 10:57:09 PM »
0
This hasn't been mentioned in the other threads to my knowledge.  I don't think the past set was designed this way.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Isildur

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4775
  • Mr. Deacon
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Separate question on the two proposed rule changes
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2011, 11:17:21 PM »
0
The past set was not designed with these changes in mind.
3 Prophets Packs ftw

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Separate question on the two proposed rule changes
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2011, 11:19:40 PM »
0
I'm going to assume "these rule changes" are the ones Bryon posted yesterday. The answer to that is, no, these were not being discussed during development of the last set. They have only recently come up as we look at simplifying things for the potential printing of new starter decks.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal