Author Topic: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"? (Read 923 times)

Isildur · « **on:** May 27, 2013, 12:12:48 AM »

What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"? Example card is Climb the Walls. Is the listed Errata/Play as correct?

Climb the Walls (Kings)
Jerusalem Tower has no effect this turn. Errata/Play As: Jerusalem Tower is negated this turn.

ChristianSoldier · « **Reply #1 on:** May 27, 2013, 01:13:55 AM »

"No effect" either means Ignored or Negated, depending on the context. Yes it is confusing, but that is what we are left with. In this case it is a negate. I'm fairly sure.

Isildur · « **Reply #2 on:** May 27, 2013, 01:55:50 PM »

If possible would one of the higher ups confirm this? My original question was asked in regards to a potential combo so I want to make sure it works

TimMierz · « **Reply #3 on:** May 28, 2013, 07:55:25 AM »

REG, Ignore, Clarifications:
The word “repel” and the phrases “has no effect,” “may not be blocked by,” and “cannot enter battle” mean the same as “ignore”.

TheJaylor · « **Reply #4 on:** May 28, 2013, 09:30:30 AM »

See Household Idols.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #5 on:** May 28, 2013, 10:36:46 AM »

"No effect" means different things in regards to characters and other types. For characters, "has no effect" means the character is ignored. For other types, it means the ability is negated. I would also think that the numbers on "no effect" enhancements are essentially 0/0, but I'm not sure if that's ever spelled out. If you want to PM me the combo I can give you my opinion on it.

Isildur · « **Reply #6 on:** May 28, 2013, 05:11:04 PM »

Prof I think you answer is sufficient enough for me not to bother sending you a PM.

Thanks!

TheJaylor · « **Reply #7 on:** May 28, 2013, 08:16:13 PM »

Quote from: Isildur on May 28, 2013, 05:11:04 PM

Prof I think you answer is sufficient enough for me not to bother sending you a PM.

Thanks!

So, out of curiosity, does this mean that the combo does or does not work?

Cactus Game Design Message Boards

News:

Author Topic: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"? (Read 923 times)

Isildur

What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?

ChristianSoldier

Re: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?

Isildur

Re: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?

TimMierz

Re: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?

TheJaylor

Re: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?

Professoralstad

Re: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?

Isildur

Re: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?

TheJaylor

Re: What would be the current definition of the old term "no effect"?