Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Chronic Apathy on October 23, 2011, 08:18:26 PM

Title: Indirect Negation
Post by: Chronic Apathy on October 23, 2011, 08:18:26 PM

Thomas and Matthew make an RA, and are blocked by 12 Fingered Giant. Matthew gets kicked out, but do the cards he drew go back as well?

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: SomeKittens on October 23, 2011, 08:21:00 PM

If the band was negated, it was like he never entered battle.  Though I'm only 65% sure of that.

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: DDiceRC on October 23, 2011, 08:23:03 PM

Frpm the 10 Commandments of Redemption sticky:

#3 - Cannot be Negated means Cannot Be Negated
Not directly, not indirectly, no way, no how.  That puppy sticks.

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: SomeKittens on October 23, 2011, 08:24:24 PM

The banding of Tom is not CBN, only enhancements.

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: DDiceRC on October 23, 2011, 08:25:38 PM

Sorry, I thought enhancements had already been played.

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: Chronic Apathy on November 12, 2011, 03:19:50 PM

I never actually got a real answer on this. I believe the cards go back, right?

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: CJSports on November 12, 2011, 04:38:47 PM

Well his SA was not negated so I don't know why they would. Just because a card leaves battle doesn't mean his ability doesn't activate. Let's say you were to CM him instead that definitely doesn't say you put the cards back.

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: RedemptionAggie on November 12, 2011, 05:58:32 PM

That's a different situation.  Since the ability that brought Matthew into battle was negated, he was never in battle, so he's also negated.  CM doesn't negate anything.

Title: Re: Indirect Negation
Post by: CJSports on November 12, 2011, 06:18:06 PM

Ok I see, so it's like mattew never happened so it technically isn't negating it.