« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary  (Read 1303 times)

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« on: September 09, 2013, 08:57:28 PM »
0
My opponent plays Sorrow of Mary and underdecks Authority of Peter. I have regular initiative at this point and play REach of Desperation. Can I play Authority of Peter off Reach of Desperation?
Logged

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2013, 09:00:56 PM »
+1
Yes

Your interrupting the placing of it on the bottom so you could play it off the play ability on reach
Logged
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline pilgrim14

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 221
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2013, 09:03:57 PM »
0
Quote from: jbeers285 on September 09, 2013, 09:00:56 PM
Yes

Your interrupting the placing of it on the bottom so you could play it off the play ability on reach
But he only has normal initiative.
Logged
"Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase" Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2013, 09:04:58 PM »
+1
Jbeers285 is correct.
Logged
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2013, 09:12:24 PM »
+1
Quote from: pilgrim14 on September 09, 2013, 09:03:57 PM
Quote from: jbeers285 on September 09, 2013, 09:00:56 PM
Yes

Your interrupting the placing of it on the bottom so you could play it off the play ability on reach
But he only has normal initiative.

Even at normal initiative, interrupts still undo what the card did, so the enhancement goes back to hand until the interrupt ends.
Logged
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline pilgrim14

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 221
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2013, 09:16:41 PM »
0
What happens after the interrupt ends?
Logged
"Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase" Martin Luther King, Jr.

Offline TheJaylor

  • Trade Count: (+18)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3119
  • Fortress Alstad
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Redemption with Jayden
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2013, 11:13:38 PM »
0
The EC is no longer in battle for Sorrow of Mary to reactivate and even if he underdecked God's Provision as long as it was played it's no longer viable after Sorrow of Mary reactivates and I don't think SoM can choose a new target at that point.
Logged

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2013, 12:15:18 PM »
0
Quote from: Westy on September 09, 2013, 08:57:28 PM
My opponent plays Sorrow of Mary and underdecks Authority of Peter. I have regular initiative at this point and play REach of Desperation. Can I play Authority of Peter off Reach of Desperation?

The real question is why would someone underdeck Authority of Peter when Reach is in the hand...I suppose probably because they might be unaware of the answer to this question.

Koala is also correct in that if the enhancement played by Reach is the card that was targeted by SoM, even if SoM could reactivate, it could no longer target anything, as its target is no longer available.
Logged
Press 1 for more options.

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2013, 12:34:29 PM »
0
If you had to choose between AoP and Reach, what is the best target? I guess you can stop them from the D3...
Logged
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: IN GAME: Reach versus Sorrow of Mary
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2013, 04:01:37 PM »
0
Quote from: Professoralstad on September 10, 2013, 12:15:18 PM
The real question is why would someone underdeck Authority of Peter when Reach is in the hand...I suppose probably because they might be unaware of the answer to this question.

That. And no matter which card was chose, AoP would still get to go off because my SoM transferred initiative. Had I known the answer I probably would have played the Balaam's Disobedience in my hand, but either way I took the greater risk and higher payout choice by hoping he didn't have 2 battle winners in hand or Reach.

Quote from: RTSmaniac on September 10, 2013, 12:34:29 PM
If you had to choose between AoP and Reach, what is the best target? I guess you can stop them from the D3...

Reach, as it allows you to underdeck something and have it stick, but in regards to winning the actual battle, it doesn't matter.
Logged
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal