Author Topic: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting  (Read 1506 times)

Offline Josh

  • Trade Count: (+46)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3187
    • -
    • East Central Region
Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« on: July 11, 2018, 09:19:34 AM »
0
Question is loosely based on a Teams game from OH States.

Player 1 attacks with a Sam/King Saul/Abby/Dave band.  Melky is in Player 1's territory protecting KS and Dave.  Player 2 blocks with Nebuchadnezzar and adds Head of Gold to battle from deck.  X=5 for HoG, so Player 2 announces they are targeting KS, Abby, Dave, Melky, and Nebuchadnezzar with HoG.

Player 1 correctly identifies that KS and Dave are protected by Melky, and that Melky is protected by Abby.  Player 1 points this out.

At this point, since those heroes couldn't be targeted, does Player 2 have to declare a new set of targets that are all legal targets?  Or since HoG says "...up to X humans...", does HoG just capture Abby and Nebby?
If creation sings Your praises so will I
If You gave Your life to love them so will I

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2018, 09:32:34 AM »
+1
Protection limits targets. If a target is incorrectly selected that is not legal then a new target can be chosen, and in some cases must be chosen.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Josh

  • Trade Count: (+46)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3187
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2018, 10:00:11 AM »
0
Protection limits targets. If a target is incorrectly selected that is not legal then a new target can be chosen, and in some cases must be chosen.

So would HoG be a "new target can be chosen" example, since it says "...up to X"?

And would a mandatory ability like Haman's Plot be a "new target must be chosen" example, since it targets exactly 3 characters?
If creation sings Your praises so will I
If You gave Your life to love them so will I

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2018, 10:02:39 AM »
+1
Protection limits targets. If a target is incorrectly selected that is not legal then a new target can be chosen, and in some cases must be chosen.

So would HoG be a "new target can be chosen" example, since it says "...up to X"?

And would a mandatory ability like Haman's Plot be a "new target must be chosen" example, since it targets exactly 3 characters?
Correct
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Jonesy

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 416
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #4 on: July 11, 2018, 12:14:48 PM »
+1
Why is that the case on cards that say up to?
Example: if A and B are protected, they play head of gold. They choose A,B,C, and D for head of gold. I then ask is that all, and they say yes. I clarify A, and B are protected. Why would they get a chance to pick again?

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2018, 12:30:07 PM »
0
Up to is an optional ability chosen by the controller. If they chose protected characters I don't see how that should be allowed to retarget anything.

Even if it said capture a hero and they target a protected hero they shouldn't get to repick a target.  The hero isnt restricted from capture it is protected. Restrict would allow you to select a new target.
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #6 on: July 11, 2018, 12:57:43 PM »
+2
There is no "retargeting" being done, there is simply the selection of legal targets.

Why is that the case on cards that say up to?
Example: if A and B are protected, they play head of gold. They choose A,B,C, and D for head of gold. I then ask is that all, and they say yes. I clarify A, and B are protected. Why would they get a chance to pick again?

They can't choose A & B to begin with.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2018, 12:59:55 PM by The Guardian »
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Kevinthedude

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1856
  • Yo
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2018, 12:59:44 PM »
+2
Up to is an optional ability chosen by the controller. If they chose protected characters I don't see how that should be allowed to retarget anything.

Even if it said capture a hero and they target a protected hero they shouldn't get to repick a target.  The hero isnt restricted from capture it is protected. Restrict would allow you to select a new target.

They don't get to pick again because they never actually picked the protected character in the first place. It's impossible for them to pick it because its protected. If they attempt to pick it you remind them that they cannot because it is protected and they pick something else.

Restrict wouldn't make sense in this context. Heroes can't be "restricted" from anything. Restrict is only used for stopping a player from performing a specific action.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Head of Gold: Protection and targeting
« Reply #8 on: July 11, 2018, 03:04:56 PM »
+2
You can apply the reasoning to any inadvertent illegal play. If a player performs a game action that’s illegal and you can go back to that point of the game and correct it then you do so. In the example given you go back to the point of selecting for HoG.

It gets messier when you realize it much later in the turn.

For sanity sake we’ve ruled that you do not correct things from a previous turn.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal