« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: First Strike vs. Rome  (Read 1567 times)

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
First Strike vs. Rome
« on: September 17, 2011, 07:40:26 PM »
0
From the REG:
Quote
If there are first strike abilities on both sides of battle, then the side that activated a first strike ability first gets the first opportunity to move the battle away from the mutual destruction state.  If that side of battle is unable to move the battle away from the mutual destruction state, the other side of battle then gets a chance.

Rome:
Your emperors have first strike and may use N.T. Enhancements of any evil brigade except orange.

If a hero with first strike is blocked by a emperor from a player that already has Rome in their territory, which first strike takes precedence?
Logged

Offline I am Knot a Blonde!

  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 609
  • You are now breathing manually.
    • -
    • Southeast Region
    • www.google.com
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2011, 08:09:30 PM »
0
Whoever enters battle first (Hero)
Logged

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2011, 09:14:22 PM »
0
Two characters with first strike act just like two characters that don't.  The two cancel each other out.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2011, 11:35:44 PM »
0
"Cancel each other out" is not correct. They both retain the defintion of First Strike - in a mutual destruction, that character will survive. If both characters have first strike, then it is a stalemate. The REG quote from Aggie then applies - the first character to activate First Strike (the hero in this case) has initiative.

Aggie, I agree with Knot. Although Rome is active before the hero enters, First Strike is not granted until the Emperor enters battle.
Logged
My wife is a hottie.

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2011, 11:37:51 PM »
0
Quote from: I am Knot a Blonde! on September 17, 2011, 08:09:30 PM
Whoever enters battle first (Hero)
+1

A character can't really have 1st strike in territory, therefore Rome must trigger when an emperor goes into battle and then adds that ability to the defender.  In this case, the hero would already have activated their own 1st strike at that point.

When 2 characters have 1st strike, whichever one activated it first counts, and the other one doesn't.

instaposted...
Logged

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2011, 11:39:25 PM »
0
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 17, 2011, 11:37:51 PM
When 2 characters have 1st strike, whichever one activated it first counts, and the other one doesn't.

Is this true? Is that in the REG?
Logged
My wife is a hottie.

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2011, 11:51:26 PM »
0
Quote from: YourMathTeacher on September 17, 2011, 11:39:25 PM
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 17, 2011, 11:37:51 PM
When 2 characters have 1st strike, whichever one activated it first counts, and the other one doesn't.
Is this true? Is that in the REG?
I thought it used to be.  However, the new REG has a different take on things:
Quote
If there are first strike abilities on both sides of battle, then the side that activated a first strike ability first gets the first opportunity to move the battle away from the mutual destruction state.  If that side of battle is unable to move the battle away from the mutual destruction state, the other side of battle then gets a chance.
This indicates that if both characters have 1st strike in a mutual destruction scenario, that both would be destroyed.  I'm curious to have another elder chime in and confirm that I am reading that correctly.
Logged

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2011, 11:54:52 PM »
0
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 17, 2011, 11:51:26 PM
This indicates that if both characters have 1st strike in a mutual destruction scenario, that both would be destroyed.

That's what SomeKittens was saying, but I disagree. I don't think the quote is saying that the battle returns to Mutual Destruction. I think that it is just referring to the state of the battle at the time First Strike was considered, since FS is not relevant unless it is a Mutual Destruction. I see that quote as just a clarification of who has initiative.
Logged
My wife is a hottie.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2011, 12:04:07 AM »
0
Quote from: YourMathTeacher on September 17, 2011, 11:39:25 PM
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 17, 2011, 11:37:51 PM
When 2 characters have 1st strike, whichever one activated it first counts, and the other one doesn't.

Is this true? Is that in the REG?

http://www.redemptionreg.com/REG/Master/gloss_firststrike.htm
Logged
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2011, 12:07:59 AM »
0
Quote
If opposing characters in battle both have first strike ability, the character who gained it first takes precedence.

That doesn't say the second one doesn't count.  In the scenario presented in the new REG (check the first one activated, if it doesn't resolve the mutual, check the other), the first one still takes precedence.  Without that clarification, I think most people would interpret the glossary entry like Prof U did.  (I did, until I looked up First Strike as an ability instead of in the glossary in the REG.)
Logged

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: First Strike vs. Rome
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2011, 12:11:22 AM »
0
If opposing characters in battle both have first strike ability, the character who gained it first takes precedence. - Glossary

First of all, why is this not in the First Strike entry for Ongoing Abilities?

Second, I still don't see this as saying anything other than "has initiative." If the intent is otherwise, then the REG needs to be clear. These silly semantics are annoyingly vague for this iteration of the REG.

So is this the ruling:

First strike abilities prevent opposing characters' first strike abilities.
Logged
My wife is a hottie.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal