Author Topic: First Strike vs Protect  (Read 2104 times)

Offline Mageduckey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 367
First Strike vs Protect
« on: April 26, 2013, 04:01:20 PM »
0
Opponent rescues with AutO -> Gideon, I block with an emperor while I have Rome in play.  Does my first strike create a stalemate, or do I have initiative because Gideon is protected from all my abilities (and consequently "ignores" my first strike)?

Rome: Your emperors have first strike...

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2013, 04:37:30 PM »
0
First Strike only applies when the battle is being determined by the numbers (not the same as FBTN). The defender has inish until his defense surpasses Gideon's attack.
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2013, 04:38:22 PM »
0
I just checked the rules for First Strike, but it doesnt mention how it interacts with immunity / protection.

My gut reaction is to say that Gideon would win that by the numbers, since first strike is meaningless on a protected character.

Offline Mageduckey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 367
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2013, 04:48:31 PM »
0
First Strike only applies when the battle is being determined by the numbers (not the same as FBTN). The defender has inish until his defense surpasses Gideon's attack.

But before any enhancements are played in the above scenario, the battle IS being determined by numbers.

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2013, 04:53:22 PM »
0
Special abilities on characters, Forts, Artifacts, ect... Can all cause effect on the battle. You don't need to wait for enhancements to affect the outcome.

Such as Rome granting first strike or Auto granting Protection. Even though no enhancement were played by the time those characters have entered (roman and Gid), the protection is already in place, therefor Gid's defense is already at */99999999
« Last Edit: April 26, 2013, 04:56:05 PM by Jmbeers »
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Offline Mageduckey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 367
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2013, 05:00:22 PM »
0
I know forts/arts/etc. affect battle ::)  However, I didn't think of his protection as giving */"infinite" abilities, which makes sense.  Thanks.

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2013, 05:06:48 PM »
0
Didn't mean to talk down to ya  :)

I've just found its better to over explain in ruling questions rather than to assume too much, I know when I was getting my start I felt like I was asking the same questions over and over again! Haha
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Offline Noah

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 672
  • AKA: tripleplayno3
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2013, 07:10:43 PM »
0
Opponent rescues with AutO -> Gideon, I block with an emperor while I have Rome in play.  Does my first strike create a stalemate, or do I have initiative because Gideon is protected from all my abilities (and consequently "ignores" my first strike)?

Rome: Your emperors have first strike...

Quote
Protect

A card cannot be targeted by an ability from which it is protected. Game rules do not apply to a card that is protected from the effect of the game rule.

Quote
First Strike

A first strike ability allows a character to survive if a battle ends in the mutual destruction state.


Based on the definitions of protection and first strike from the Redemption Wiki since Rome is targeting the Emperor (not Gideon) Auto's protection doesn't affect whether or not the Emperor has first strike. With that in mind Gideon would have initiative until his Defense exceeds the Emperor's attack because the isn't loosing in the mutual destruction while he has first strike. If the battle where to end in mutual destruction both characters would survive. The Emperor because he has first strike and Gideon because he is protected from the Emperor. The key here is being protected from a character doesn't pass initiative like Immunity would. It only restricts what can target the protected card or what can defeat the protected card.

Does that make sense? :)
Filling my Ark since Nats 2016.

Soli Deo Gloria

#CascadeDelendaEst

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2013, 07:15:35 PM »
+1
That is not correct.

Protection from Evil Characters works exactly like immunity, and as Jmbeers said last week, that essentially means the protected character is */infinity. Which means the battle is never in a mutual destruction situation, so FS never applies.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2013, 07:16:00 PM »
+1
With that in mind Gideon would have initiative until his Defense exceeds the Emperor's attack because the isn't loosing in the mutual destruction while he has first strike. If the battle where to end in mutual destruction both characters would survive.

To think of what Prof A said in another way (obviously not wording it this way because I got instaposted or anything  ::)), it cannot be mutual destruction because Gideon is protected from the numbers on the Emperor.  Therefore, it would actually be a situation where Gideon is winning (if the battle ends, the Emperor is discarded by the numbers and he is not) until the Emperor's defense passes Gideon's attack.

Being protected from the numbers means that first strike just does not come into play in this scenario.  It literally cannot be mutual destruction if one side cannot be discarded by the numbers, like Prof A said (who totally did not beat me by a few seconds causing me to edit).
« Last Edit: May 01, 2013, 07:18:03 PM by Redoubter »

Offline Noah

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 672
  • AKA: tripleplayno3
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2013, 07:49:06 PM »
0
With that in mind Gideon would have initiative until his Defense exceeds the Emperor's attack because the isn't loosing in the mutual destruction while he has first strike. If the battle where to end in mutual destruction both characters would survive.

To think of what Prof A said in another way (obviously not wording it this way because I got instaposted or anything  ::)), it cannot be mutual destruction because Gideon is protected from the numbers on the Emperor.  Therefore, it would actually be a situation where Gideon is winning (if the battle ends, the Emperor is discarded by the numbers and he is not) until the Emperor's defense passes Gideon's attack.

Being protected from the numbers means that first strike just does not come into play in this scenario.  It literally cannot be mutual destruction if one side cannot be discarded by the numbers, like Prof A said (who totally did not beat me by a few seconds causing me to edit).

So does that mean the Emperor has initiative so long as his defense doesn't exceed Gideon's attack?

That is not correct.

Thanks for correcting me. :)
Filling my Ark since Nats 2016.

Soli Deo Gloria

#CascadeDelendaEst

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2013, 07:57:25 PM »
0
With that in mind Gideon would have initiative until his Defense exceeds the Emperor's attack because the isn't loosing in the mutual destruction while he has first strike. If the battle where to end in mutual destruction both characters would survive.

To think of what Prof A said in another way (obviously not wording it this way because I got instaposted or anything  ::)), it cannot be mutual destruction because Gideon is protected from the numbers on the Emperor.  Therefore, it would actually be a situation where Gideon is winning (if the battle ends, the Emperor is discarded by the numbers and he is not) until the Emperor's defense passes Gideon's attack.

Being protected from the numbers means that first strike just does not come into play in this scenario.  It literally cannot be mutual destruction if one side cannot be discarded by the numbers, like Prof A said (who totally did not beat me by a few seconds causing me to edit).

So does that mean the Emperor has initiative so long as his defense doesn't exceed Gideon's attack?

That is not correct.

Thanks for correcting me. :)

Yes as long as the Emp's defense is equal with or lower than Gideon's offense.


Prof would FS technically still happen like say vit is out there and no enhancements play

Vit hits Gideon with FS  but since Gideon is protected it doesn't happen giving Gideon his chance to strike and kill vit?  I know it's a technicality but I am curious if Gideon protection actually restricts the first strike or if he just is protected from it?
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2013, 08:03:57 PM »
+1
Vit hits Gideon with FS  but since Gideon is protected it doesn't happen giving Gideon his chance to strike and kill vit?  I know it's a technicality but I am curious if Gideon protection actually restricts the first strike or if he just is protected from it?

I know it's tempting to think of it this way, because of how other games treat first strike, but the rule is:

Quote
First Strike

A first strike ability allows a character to survive if a battle ends in the mutual destruction state.

It is never in mutual destruction, because Gideon cannot be discarded.  He isn't preventing or protecting from first strike at all, he is just protecting from the numbers making a mutual destruction scenario impossible.  He never gets 'hit' by first strike, it just doesn't come into play because the condition it relies on never arrives.

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #13 on: May 08, 2013, 11:50:03 PM »
0
If that's the definition of first strike, then why is an emperor with first strike deemed to be winning? The definition says nothing about the holder of first strike winning, but rather surviving. Wouldn't this be more in line with how a heal ability returns a character to territory when it's being discarded?
Just one more thing...

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: First Strike vs Protect
« Reply #14 on: May 09, 2013, 04:41:01 PM »
+1
If that's the definition of first strike, then why is an emperor with first strike deemed to be winning? The definition says nothing about the holder of first strike winning, but rather surviving. Wouldn't this be more in line with how a heal ability returns a character to territory when it's being discarded?

The rest of the First Strike entry is helpful here:

Quote
First strike applies to the rules of initiative during battle and in battle resolution at the end of battle. The following conditions are important for determining initiative and battle resolution:
 -one or more characters in battle have a first strike ability
 -the battle is in the mutual destruction state
 -the strength of a first strike character is greater than or equal to the toughness of all the character(s) on the other side of battle
If these conditions are met, then the battle is moved to the Hero winning or Evil Character winning state (whichever one is in favor of the character with first strike).
Press 1 for more options.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal