Author Topic: First Strike  (Read 1416 times)

Offline Ammian

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
  • The Inquirer strikes again
First Strike
« on: November 11, 2010, 12:59:43 PM »
0
Maybe there's something in the REG I missed...

If you gain first strike through, say, Godspeed, and then your opponent gains first strike through, say, Ferocious attack, what does that mean?  Do the first strikes just cancel each other out?  In that case, aren't those cards being indirectly negated?  I'm confused ...what happens?

Wondering yet again,
Ammian
"Peace is not the absence of fear, but the presence of God." -Chris Vroon

Offline Cpt.Jaeger

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+139)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1481
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: First Strike
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2010, 01:02:54 PM »
0
edit---- never mind, wrong
« Last Edit: November 11, 2010, 05:04:47 PM by Cpt.Jaeger »
Player, collector, fan, and friend since 2002.

Offline Ammian

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
  • The Inquirer strikes again
Re: First Strike
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2010, 01:15:29 PM »
0
Gotcha ...thanks!  That's what I thought.

Blessings and peace,
Ammian
"Peace is not the absence of fear, but the presence of God." -Chris Vroon

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: First Strike
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2010, 01:41:35 PM »
0
I thought it was the first First Strike to enter battle is the one that works.

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: First Strike
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2010, 01:54:33 PM »
0
I thought it was the first First Strike to enter battle is the one that works.
I also think that I remember it this way.  (Unless you're using that one "first strike" card that says to negate all other first strikes, or regardless of other first strikes, or something like that).

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: First Strike
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2010, 02:01:33 PM »
0
I thought it was the first First Strike to enter battle is the one that works.
I also think that I remember it this way.  (Unless you're using that one "first strike" card that says to negate all other first strikes, or regardless of other first strikes, or something like that).
Godspeed and Ferocious Attack is not that one poorly worded card...

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2010, 02:08:54 PM »
0
This is why we need a second strike ability.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: First Strike
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2010, 04:33:54 PM »
0
Nah, I think we need a preemptive strike.  And instead of banding, we could have a coalition of the willing :)

Offline The M

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • FALCON PUNCH!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: First Strike
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2010, 06:41:07 PM »
0
awww.... they get infinite initiative if I am oblivious to them... ;D
Retired?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal