New Redemption Grab Bag now includes an assortment of 500 cards from five (5) different expansion sets. Available at Cactus website.
I know this is off topic but why didn't they make Armorbearer Warrior Class?
Yes, I am aware of that but they also reprinted him in Kings the set that introduces warrior class.
I'm about 95% sure that Armorbearer was never reprinted.
Quote from: Chronic Apathy on February 24, 2012, 10:54:53 AMI'm about 95% sure that Armorbearer was never reprinted.I'm 100% sure. There is no Kings Armorbearer.
Quote from: Professoralstad on February 24, 2012, 12:03:25 PMQuote from: Chronic Apathy on February 24, 2012, 10:54:53 AMI'm about 95% sure that Armorbearer was never reprinted.I'm 100% sure. There is no Kings Armorbearer.Well I'M 105% sure! Beat that Alstad!
Beat that Alstad!
Quote from: Chronic Apathy on February 25, 2012, 10:08:03 AMBeat that Alstad!Done.
I am somewhat confused about indirect negating, can someone please explain indirect negating to me
Hey,Quote from: cookie monster on February 24, 2012, 09:33:40 AMI am somewhat confused about indirect negating, can someone please explain indirect negating to me If an ability activates as part of another ability and if the other ability is negated the first ability is indirectly negated. Negating the other ability means undoing everything that it did, one of the things it did was activate the first ability, so undoing it means undoing the first ability.For example, character A has an ability to band and bands to character B. Character A's ability caused Character B to enter battle. Character B entering battle causes character B's ability to take effect. So character A's ability indirectly caused character B's ability to activate. Negating character A's ability undoes everything it caused. It caused character B to enter battle, so character B is moved out of battle. It indirectly caused character B's ability to take effect, so it undoes (i.e. indirectly negates) character B's ability.Tschow,Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly
Because that would result in a loop...
This makes sense to me, but it does not explain why if Character A bands to Character B, who happens to be a FBTN character and thus negates the band of Character A, that the remainder of the battle is FBTN. Why didn't negating the band "indirectly" negate the FBTN status of the battle too?