Author Topic: ehud question  (Read 9349 times)

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #25 on: August 08, 2009, 11:03:34 PM »
0
The CTB part of his SA would be a 7 (the rest would be a 3), which would still be before the enhancement at 8, if that's where placed enhancements fall.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: ehud question
« Reply #26 on: August 08, 2009, 11:05:02 PM »
0
so would that mean ehuds ability would activate before the placed enhancement?  becasue his SA would be a 3 and the enhancement would be an 8

If my understanding is correct, then yes.  Generally speaking, Mike has a much better grasp on the rules than I do, so I wouldn't bet the farm that I understand this correctly.  He is the keeper of the REG after all. :)
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #27 on: August 08, 2009, 11:07:02 PM »
0
I don't think that placed abilities are at #8. Gabe's examples represent scenarios that fit under #8, but most placed cards are not triggered. They are just there. That seems more like a gained ability.

sepjazz, consider a gained ability that lets you CTB. That would fall under #7, not #4.
My wife is a hottie.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #28 on: August 08, 2009, 11:10:15 PM »
0
Except I know for a fact that it was ruled that placed enhs such as those from Agur activate at the same time as WC enhs.

Also, Chris got exactly what I meant with Ahimaaz. If I decide BC/RA AFTER his ability, then those combos are dead. I've always thought that the declaration of intent came first and foremost.

I don't think that placed abilities are at #8. Gabe's examples represent scenarios that fit under #8, but most placed cards are not triggered. They are just there. That seems more like a gained ability.

sepjazz, consider a gained ability that lets you CTB. That would fall under #7, not #4.

Nope, its still a CTB ability, so it goes later.

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #29 on: August 08, 2009, 11:12:29 PM »
0
Nope, its still a CTB ability, so it goes later.

That's what I said.
My wife is a hottie.

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #30 on: August 08, 2009, 11:15:00 PM »
0
but that seems to go against the wording on the card if it activates as a weapon, its says on augr the enhancement activates when the character enters battle, which by no streatch of the imagination falls directly into a 8

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #31 on: August 08, 2009, 11:18:36 PM »
0
Nope, its still a CTB ability, so it goes later.

That's what I said.

Misread it, my bad.

Offline Hanno102

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 96
Re: ehud question
« Reply #32 on: August 08, 2009, 11:19:18 PM »
0

I've always thought that the declaration of intent came first and foremost.


I've always thought the same thing as well.  In fact, declaration of intent would have to come first for combos like Hidden Treasures - Prophet - ANB to work.  We all know how well that works...

Now that I think about it though, cards such as Great Mourning and Besieging the City specifically disallow Rescue Attempts while letting battle challenges get through.  If declaration of intent happened first, then sticky situations like Mahari going out as a BC against the NT only then banding claudia in to make it a Rescue attempt would work even if Great Mourning had been played...
*~* Philmont Graduate, Class of 2005 *~*

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #33 on: August 08, 2009, 11:20:32 PM »
0
but that seems to go against the wording on the card if it activates as a weapon, its says on augr the enhancement activates when the character enters battle, which by no streatch of the imagination falls directly into a 8

Understand that this an order of operations that was devised by mathematicians in the early 17th Century.

The wording of the card is not what is relevant (per se). The type of ability is what matters. For example, if a banding hero enters battle with a weapon, logically the banding should come before the weapon since the banding is the hero's SA (#3). However, the PTBs decided that banding abilities come after weapon abilities. So the hero's SA is suspended until its designated time.
My wife is a hottie.

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #34 on: August 08, 2009, 11:24:47 PM »
0
but wouldnt the wording on agur superseed the game rule and let the enhancement activate as a 8 like its SA would suggest just like high priests palace protect saducces from being discarded by a game rule

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #35 on: August 08, 2009, 11:28:25 PM »
0
This may just be a question of semantics, but I see no difference between "when hero enters battle" and "abilities triggered by the beginning of battle." All abilities still have to activate when that hero enters and begins a battle. The order that they activate is clearly laid out.
My wife is a hottie.

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #36 on: August 08, 2009, 11:31:40 PM »
0
i was thinking they would mean the same thing, but if thee is a difference between the 2 and the mean something different show how they are different.  my argument is based on them meaning the same thing and if they dont then the 3 just needs to be changed to include placed enhancements and WC enhancements and we have no problem

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #37 on: August 08, 2009, 11:58:14 PM »
0
Therein lies the problem. Your quick fix is not going to work, because some placed abilities are triggered by "beginning or entering battle," which forces them down to #8.
My wife is a hottie.

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #38 on: August 09, 2009, 12:01:34 AM »
0
but that would be a good thing for my combo, ehud would chose with his 7 SA then kill with the 8 enhancement, thats what i want to work

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #39 on: August 09, 2009, 12:11:52 AM »
0
Well, I want my Jacob's Ladder to allow me to rescue my own Lost Souls, but it just doesn't work that way. Sorry.  ;)
My wife is a hottie.

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #40 on: August 09, 2009, 12:19:05 AM »
0
this doesnt have to be another jacobs ladder, so until someone with authority says that it doesnt work then it remains unruled officially. 

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #41 on: August 09, 2009, 01:08:03 AM »
0
this doesnt have to be another jacobs ladder, so until someone with authority says that it doesnt work then it remains unruled officially.  

Tournament hosts have authority. It would do you well to listen to them, since they're the ones who will have to rule at tournaments. ;)

And I just realized that sounds kind of arrogant. lol I'm just saying that I agree with YourMathTeacher.

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #42 on: August 09, 2009, 09:36:30 AM »
0
Although I thank you for your support, I can only make rulings at my own tournaments that are official.

However, sepjazz, you will have to specifically state what placed card you are talking about and how it got there, before any official ruling can be made.
My wife is a hottie.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #43 on: August 09, 2009, 12:09:02 PM »
0
2 - An Enhancement placed by someone like Agur or Elishana the Priest is an ability that triggers when the Hero enters battle, similar to the way Hidden Treasures triggers, isn't it?  Wouldn't that put those under #8?  Is there a difference between "hero enters battle" and "hero beggins a battle" that I'm missing?

Bumping this back to the top of the discussion, because this can make a huge difference.

Agur and co. all say "When hero enters battle" I think entering battle is what triggers ALL of his abilities, and then cards like HT trigger because once the heroes abilitys have completed, he has "begun the battle."

So, i'd organize the list like so:

1.  Declaration of Intent
2.  Hero leaves hand or territory
3.  Hero enters Field of Battle, all SA's and placed cards activate in this order:
  A.  Activate special ability on Hero, unless they add characters to battle.
  B.  Activate gained abilities, unless they add characters to battle.
  C.  Activate weapon-class abilities (none add characters to battle that I can think of)
  D.  Activate Placed Enhancements, unless they add characters to battle.
  E.  Activate banding abilities
  F.  Activate choose the blocker abilities
  G.  Activate special abilities triggered by the beginning of battle, such as HT.

That is how I've always played the order of abilities.

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #44 on: August 09, 2009, 12:14:24 PM »
0
Since this has become a "how do you think Redemption should work" type thread, I might as well post what I think it should do.

1. Present the Hero
2. Declare the intention
3. Activate Hero abilities
a. special abilites on the hero,including gained abilities, excluding CtB and Banding
b. Weapons and other placed abilities (i.e Elishana)
c. Banding
d. Choose the blocker.
e. move on to the next hero and restart at 3, a. (if there are more multiple heroes in battle)
4. Activate triggers (Hidden Treasures, etc)

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #45 on: August 09, 2009, 12:30:02 PM »
0
The only problem that I have with that is all of the placement cards are worded in such a way that the enhancement triggers upon the beginning of battle which makes them a G type special ability.

Also two scenario's to consider:


Scenario 1:

Rescue with ET and Play Unified Kingdom, all the heroes enter battle, among them is Jacob. Becuase I choose the order to activate special abilites I play Obediance of Noah off of Jacob. Is Obediance shunted down to F, or because its played off Jacob is it under his Umbrella of A type abilities?

Scenario 2:

You played Great Mourning against me.

Because Declaration of Intent comes first I choose the N.T. soul, then push Maharai into battle, this is legal because its not a rescue attempt but a battle challenge, Then using Maharai I band in Claudai making it a Rescue attempt, circumventing Great Mourning.

EDIT: Got Instaposted, this is directed towards Lamborghini's Order of Ops.

Additionally because all of these are a series of Operations which you do for each individual hero, when I play a mass band card like Unified Kingdom, there is nothing that stops me from choosing Ehud as the first hero, then Michael as the second, using Angel's Sword to Play Striking Herod and killing the EC.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 12:34:41 PM by Red Dragon Thorn »
www.covenantgames.com

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #46 on: August 09, 2009, 12:56:07 PM »
0
Sepjazz may have been right earlier in the thread: Placed cards need to be added to the Order of Operations for clarity. I always just based their activation on the type of ability, but if there is this much uncertainty, then clarification is necessary.
My wife is a hottie.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #47 on: August 09, 2009, 12:56:29 PM »
0
The only problem that I have with that is all of the placement cards are worded in such a way that the enhancement triggers upon the beginning of battle which makes them a G type special ability.

No they arent. The following is taken straight from those cards: "The next time that Hero enters battle that enhancement activates and is discarded immediately."

It says enter battle, not begins battle. So, it activates around step D in my list.

Quote
Scenario 1:

Rescue with ET and Play Unified Kingdom, all the heroes enter battle, among them is Jacob. Becuase I choose the order to activate special abilites I play Obediance of Noah off of Jacob. Is Obediance shunted down to F, or because its played off Jacob is it under his Umbrella of A type abilities?
My list is for just a single card with multiple abilities. Besides, with jacob, Obediance would be the last card to activate for HIS order of abilities. Then, you would band in another character after his abilities finish, including Obed. I would see playing a mass band enhancement as a viable method to CTB and then play a card afterwards.

Quote
You played Great Mourning against me.

Because Declaration of Intent comes first I choose the N.T. soul, then push Maharai into battle, this is legal because its not a rescue attempt but a battle challenge, Then using Maharai I band in Claudai making it a Rescue attempt, circumventing Great Mourning.

Issue, I said Declaration of Intent comes first. If what I listed is true, then you wouldnt even be allowed to SAY "im going for the NT soul." GM says you cannot make a RA, so you cannot DECLARE a soul is to be rescued at all, meaning you could ONLY enter battle with a battle challenge. So this point is null.

Quote
Additionally because all of these are a series of Operations which you do for each individual hero, when I play a mass band card like Unified Kingdom, there is nothing that stops me from choosing Ehud as the first hero, then Michael as the second, using Angel's Sword to Play Striking Herod and killing the EC.

Yes, I see banding Ehud in first, and then Michael second to be a viable way to do this. I actually had a combo built around that.



Sepjazz may have been right earlier in the thread: Placed cards need to be added to the Order of Operations for clarity. I always just based their activation on the type of ability, but if there is this much uncertainty, then clarification is necessary.

I've been saying that for a long time now.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 12:59:15 PM by Lamborghini_diablo »

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #48 on: August 09, 2009, 01:01:07 PM »
0
I've been saying that for a long time now.

Nice try, but I'm giving all the credit to Sepjazz and there's nothing you can do about it.  :P
My wife is a hottie.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #49 on: August 09, 2009, 01:05:41 PM »
0

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal