Author Topic: DoN vs. Lampy  (Read 3271 times)

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
DoN vs. Lampy
« on: January 30, 2012, 08:39:28 AM »
0
This came up awhile ago and I still don't understand why it doesn't work, why can't Destruction Negate and Discard Lampstand? It negates and discards and artifact, so wouldn't it negate Lampstand's protection?

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2012, 08:43:30 AM »
0
Destruction of Nehushtan (Pa)

Type: Grim Reaper • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Discard one active Artifact in play. Artifact's ability is negated. • Play As: Discard one Artifact to negate its special ability. • Identifiers: False Religious Practice • Verse: II Kings 18:4 • Availability: Patriarchs booster packs (Ultra Rare)

The first part of the ability is to discard an Artifact (can't, LotS is protected), then you negate the discarded Artifact (you didn't discard one so there's nothing to negate).
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2012, 11:56:20 AM »
0
Protect abilities keep anything under the protection from being targeted by anything other than negate abilities. The way DoN is worded (with the discard ability before the negate ability), Lampstand is protected from the discard ability. Since the negate ability can only target the card that is also being discarded, since the discard ability can't target Lampstand, the negate also doesn't have anything to target. I hope that made sense, since I doubt it did. It took me a while to understand the logic behind this as well.

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2012, 12:01:44 PM »
0
This is the perfect opportunity to use a classic phrase: I get it, but I don't. I understand what you guys are saying it just seems wrong the a card working as it's supposed to is so important in the explanation of Michael's CBN but doesn't say that ability, but not in this case.

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2012, 12:12:27 PM »
-3
I'd bring up Split Altar but then somebod- *is shot*

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2012, 12:31:52 PM »
+1
This is the perfect opportunity to use a classic phrase: I get it, but I don't. I understand what you guys are saying it just seems wrong the a card working as it's supposed to is so important in the explanation of Michael's CBN but doesn't say that ability, but not in this case.
This is more straightforward than Mike.  Most cards nowadays say "negate and discard," but the old wording on DoN actually worked this time, since the discard happens before the negate.

I'd bring up Split Altar but then somebod- *is shot*
Wow.  I seem to be -1ing your posts a lot lately.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2012, 12:33:47 PM »
0
I deserved a -1 on that post, though I wonder if the other person to -1 it was joking or not.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2012, 12:36:12 PM »
0
RDT, add to FAQ, ASAP, s'il vous plait.  ;)
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2012, 12:38:40 PM »
0
I deserved a -1 on that post, though I wonder if the other person to -1 it was joking or not.
I'm pretty sure he was not joking.

« Last Edit: January 29, 2012, 12:37:05 PM by [Redacted] »
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2012, 12:39:24 PM »
0
I wasn't aware [Redacted] could travel in time.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2012, 12:41:16 PM »
+1
I've added Split Altered to my HoS, and sits right next to my A New-tered Beginning.  :P
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #11 on: January 30, 2012, 12:43:44 PM »
0
I wasn't aware [Redacted] could travel in time.
Psh.  That's the least of his/her powers.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #12 on: January 30, 2012, 12:52:26 PM »
0
This is more straightforward than Mike.  Most cards nowadays say "negate and discard," but the old wording on DoN actually worked this time, since the discard happens before the negate.

Right, but Michael does not say he can't be negated. The reasoning for him being CBN was that otherwise he would not work as intended. Even though it does not say anything about him being CBN, it was just to make his ability work the way he was supposed to. Regardless of word order it's pretty obvious that DoN was intended to negate and discard an artifact. But it doesn't.

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #13 on: January 30, 2012, 12:54:30 PM »
0
This is more straightforward than Mike.  Most cards nowadays say "negate and discard," but the old wording on DoN actually worked this time, since the discard happens before the negate.

Right, but Michael does not say he can't be negated. The reasoning for him being CBN was that otherwise he would not work as intended. Even though it does not say anything about him being CBN, it was just to make his ability work the way he was supposed to. Regardless of word order it's pretty obvious that DoN was intended to negate and discard an artifact. But it doesn't.

Some cards simply don't work how they're supposed to. I welcome the -1's when I say that Split Altar is an example of that, whereas there's no problem with adding things like ANB is removed from the game to keep it from being broken. It's frustrating and unfair, but that's how it works.

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #14 on: January 30, 2012, 12:55:40 PM »
0
like I said, I get it but I don't  :scratch: DoN vs. Lampy make brain hurt. Errata DoN to work! (kidding)

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #15 on: January 30, 2012, 01:10:30 PM »
-3
I deserved a -1 on that post, though I wonder if the other person to -1 it was joking or not.

I - 1 every post that mentions Split Altar. Nothing personal.  ;)
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2012, 01:13:16 PM »
0
I'm lost, what happened with The Card That Must Not Be Named?

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2012, 01:19:15 PM »
0
I'm lost, what happened with The Card That Must Not Be Named?
All cards default targeting to in play, unless another target is mentioned (see MLaMG).  Therefore, said card cannot target face-down artifacts (as it was intentioned to do).

Unfortunately, Rob Anderson refused to fix my [cardname] with a Sharpie at Nats.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2012, 01:20:24 PM »
0
Wasn't this why Errata was invented?

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2012, 01:22:23 PM »
0
whereas there's no problem with adding things like ANB is removed from the game to keep it from being broken. It's frustrating and unfair, but that's how it works.

It's frustrating and unfair that everyone keeps stating that ANB broke the game!   >:(

Agur & Co. + recursion + MN players broke the game.  Get it right, thank you very much.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2012, 01:25:00 PM »
+1
whereas there's no problem with adding things like ANB is removed from the game to keep it from being broken. It's frustrating and unfair, but that's how it works.

It's frustrating and unfair that everyone keeps stating that ANB broke the game!   >:(

Agur & Co. + recursion + MN players broke the game.  Get it right, thank you very much.

I think they should have just banned the card, rather than add abilities to it that are nowhere to be found on the card itself.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2012, 01:25:47 PM »
+1
Wasn't this why Errata was invented?
Ask any player but an Elder or Rob and you'd get a positive response.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2012, 01:27:09 PM »
0

I think they should have just banned the card, rather than add abilities to it that are nowhere to be found on the card itself.

Prepare to be attacked by STAMP



It's frustrating and unfair that everyone keeps stating that ANB broke the game!   >:(

Agur & Co. + recursion + MN players broke the game.  Get it right, thank you very much.

Players cannot break the game, only find how cards are broken.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #23 on: January 30, 2012, 01:27:52 PM »
0
whereas there's no problem with adding things like ANB is removed from the game to keep it from being broken. It's frustrating and unfair, but that's how it works.

It's frustrating and unfair that everyone keeps stating that ANB broke the game!   >:(

Agur & Co. + recursion + MN players broke the game.  Get it right, thank you very much.

I think they should have just banned the card, rather than add abilities to it that are nowhere to be found on the card itself.

Then start a list of every card that "Agur & Co. + recursion + MN players" breaks.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline christiangamer25

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 966
  • In brightest day, in blackest night...
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: DoN vs. Lampy
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2012, 05:02:27 AM »
0
funniest story from this is i attend one of korunks tourneys this gets ruled wrong which prolly costs me the tourney (no hard feelings) but then later at regionals im playing vs his wife with him next to me same question comes up oh the reaction was priceless.
No evil shall escape my sight, Let those who worship evil beware my power, Green Lantern's light

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal