Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Tsavong Lah on January 16, 2009, 09:25:50 PM

Title: Doctrine Like Leaven
Post by: Tsavong Lah on January 16, 2009, 09:25:50 PM

I assume that "type" refers to identifiers, so that if you set aside a Sadducee you can recur any generic Sadducee, correct? Or does it refer to the actual card set aside, so that you have to set aside a generic Sadducee to recur generic Sadducees?

Doctrine Like Leaven
Type: Evil Enh. • Brigade: Black/Gray • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Set aside a Pharisee or Sadducee and decrease it 0/1 per turn. Each upkeep phase, search your discard pile for a generic Evil Character of the type set aside. Place it in your territory. • Identifiers: None • Verse: Matthew 16:12 • Availability: Rock of Ages (Set 18)

Title: Re: Doctrine Like Leaven
Post by: Cameron the Conqueror on January 16, 2009, 09:42:22 PM

the ECs that you search for must be generic.  You can set aside any phar or sad.

Title: Re: Doctrine Like Leaven
Post by: Tsavong Lah on January 16, 2009, 10:08:14 PM

Do they have to be the same brigade (i.e. Sadducee or Pharisee), or can I set aside High Priest Annas to search for gray Pharisees?

Title: Re: Doctrine Like Leaven
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 16, 2009, 10:14:32 PM

I thought that the word "type" was referring to whether it was a Pharisee or Sadducee, not whether it was unique or generic (since you can only search for generic anyway). If you set aside a Pharisee, you can only search for generic Pharisees.

Title: Re: Doctrine Like Leaven
Post by: BubbleBoy on January 16, 2009, 10:18:55 PM

That has always been my interpretation.

Title: Re: Doctrine Like Leaven
Post by: The Schaef on January 17, 2009, 02:22:05 AM

Set aside a Pharisee-type to recur any generic Pharisee-types, or set aside a Sadducee-type to recur any generic Sadducee-types.

Title: Re: Doctrine Like Leaven
Post by: Tsavong Lah on January 17, 2009, 03:31:36 AM

Okay, got it. Thanks! :)