Author Topic: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside  (Read 2860 times)

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« on: September 08, 2009, 04:41:53 PM »
0
if i have DD active, can i discard DD at anytime during either players turn heroes are set aside, or can i only discard it during my prep phase?

Darius' Decree
Type: Artifact • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Opponents may not play good Enhancements from hand, unless an Evil Character is in battle. You may discard this card to discard all Heroes in set-aside areas. • Identifiers: None • Verse: Daniel 6:9 • Availability: Thesaurus ex Preteritus booster packs ()

"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2009, 04:45:30 PM »
0
I think since it's an instant ability you can only activate it at the time the artifact is activated.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2009, 05:47:46 PM »
0
Can we get some more-official ruling on this? I have a feeling it might pop up in a game I'm playing currently...

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2009, 05:55:50 PM »
0
i see no reason why a player couldnt discard dd anytime during a turn if it had a legal target...
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2009, 05:58:51 PM »
0
You can use it anytime, similar to how you can use Unholy Writ any time.

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2009, 05:59:35 PM »
0
Hey,

The ability to discard Darius' Decree is an optional instantaneous ability.  Following precedent for that sort of ability on artifacts (Unholy Writ, Holy Grail) it can be used at any time the owner chooses to while the artifact is active.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2009, 07:12:21 PM »
0
awesome. so, if i have DD active from a previous turn, and i draw the shame lost soul to set aside a hero, can i discard DD during my draw phase, then activate another artifact during my prep phase?

Jeremiah 3:25 ('shame')
Type: Lost Soul • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: When you draw this card, you may set aside a Hero from each territory for two turns. • Identifiers: None • Verse: Jeremiah 3:25 • Availability: Rock of Ages (Set 15)
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline adamfincher

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 998
  • Be Godly!
    • Facebook
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2009, 07:16:05 PM »
0
awesome. so, if i have DD active from a previous turn, and i draw the shame lost soul to set aside a hero, can i discard DD during my draw phase, then activate another artifact during my prep phase?

Jeremiah 3:25 ('shame')
Type: Lost Soul • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: When you draw this card, you may set aside a Hero from each territory for two turns. • Identifiers: None • Verse: Jeremiah 3:25 • Availability: Rock of Ages (Set 15)

yes, as it works any time its active just like unwholywrit.

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2009, 07:28:00 PM »
0
I'm not sure you can do it in your draw phase, but you might be allowed to use it during upkeep phase and then activate another artifact during prep phase. I'm not 100% certain either way tho.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2009, 09:37:52 PM »
0
So, If my opponent activates DD with the intent to discard it to nuke my heros can I Destruction it since its not instantaneous, but rather and optional triggered, meaning that he would have to give me an opportunity similar to Holy Grail?
www.covenantgames.com

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2009, 09:45:49 PM »
0
Hey,

awesome. so, if i have DD active from a previous turn, and i draw the shame lost soul to set aside a hero, can i discard DD during my draw phase, then activate another artifact during my prep phase?

I believe that the only thing you can do during the draw phase is draw and the only thing you can do during the upkeep phase is upkeep things.  So I would say you cannot use DD during either of those phases (although that is very much just my opinion).  You definitely could discard DD at the beginning of your prep phase and then activate a new artifact after that.

So, If my opponent activates DD with the intent to discard it to nuke my heros can I Destruction it since its not instantaneous, but rather and optional triggered, meaning that he would have to give me an opportunity similar to Holy Grail?

Triggering an artifact has the same level of precedence as playing a dominant.  If players want to play cards with the same level of precedence at the same time, the player that performed the last action gets the first chance to perform the next one.  So if I block your Lydia with King of Tyrus I can trigger my Unholy Writ to capture her before you can play Destruction to get rid of my Writ.  And if I activate Darius' Decree I can discard it before you can get rid of it with Destruction.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2009, 07:45:58 AM »
0
Triggering an artifact has the same level of precedence as playing a dominant.  If players want to play cards with the same level of precedence at the same time, the player that performed the last action gets the first chance to perform the next one.  So if I block your Lydia with King of Tyrus I can trigger my Unholy Writ to capture her before you can play Destruction to get rid of my Writ.  And if I activate Darius' Decree I can discard it before you can get rid of it with Destruction.
I disagree with this line of reasoning.  Dominants should have the highest "level of precedence" in the game.  If you attack me with a character, and I block with Saphira to make it FBN while having Unknown Nation turned on, then you should be able to decide that now that the battle is FBN, that me adding in a 2nd EC would be very hard to get past, and therefore you want to play DoN on my art.

At the same time, I agree that DD can discard itself as part of its activation, which would not give an opportunity for DoN to get it.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2009, 09:00:48 AM »
0
You definitely could discard DD at the beginning of your prep phase and then activate a new artifact after that.

If you use an Artifact during your prep phase it counts as your use of an Artifact for that turn - even if the Artifact was active from a previous turn. 

At least that's what I was told when I posted the same type of question.   My exact question was about using a previoulsy active Gifts of the Magi to draw from Feast of Trumpets, then I wanted to activate another Artifact.  I'm pretty sure Bryon was the one that answered that post but it was probably lost in the purge.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2009, 01:55:47 PM »
0
Hey,

If you use an Artifact during your prep phase it counts as your use of an Artifact for that turn - even if the Artifact was active from a previous turn.

I thought about that after I made my post.  Perhaps I shouldn't have used the word definitely :)

It doesn't surprise me that Bryon holds that sentiment, but I'm not entirely comfortable with it.

I'm playing a Zebulun deck.  I know you have Christian Martyr in you hand.  I haven't drawn my healing card yet so I keep Lampstand active to stop your Christian Martyr.  On my previous turn I used one of the draw set asides.  So then my prep phase starts, I bring back the set aside and draw and one of the cards I draw is my healing card.  I don't need Lampstand to save my Zebulun from your Christian Martyr anymore so I activate a different artifact.  I "used" Lampstand between the beginning of my preparation phase and the completion of the draw ability, didn't I?

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly


Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2009, 02:07:53 PM »
0
Lampstand was active, yes.  Since it's not an optional use Artifact like DD and GotM, LoTS probably isn't a good example to illustrate your point. 

FWIW I'm totally in favor of being able use the Artifact and chooose a new one.  I just don't believe that the rules allow it.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline NWJosh

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 752
  • The Force is strong with this one.
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #15 on: September 09, 2009, 02:20:26 PM »
0
I have to agree with Gabe, also because I has a similar question to that of his Gifts of the Magi one.

I feel if a players chooses to use an artifacts ability that is optional then they have chosen that as there artifact for that turn and can not activate a new artifact baring special abilty that allows for an artifact to be activated.
I never want to grow up, hmmm maybe thats why I'm a youth pastor.

Offline Bryon

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4821
  • Dare to Tread into the Dawn
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Redemption California
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #16 on: September 09, 2009, 02:22:35 PM »
0
Tim is correct that you cannot insert dominants or optional abilities into the draw and upkeep phases.  Ongoing abilities do apply, though.

Once you have used an artifact's optional ability, it seems to me that you've chosen to make that your active artifact for your turn.

Maybe the best option would be to deactivate all of your artifacts automatically at the beginning of the prep phase, and then you could immediately respond with the activation of an artifact (including the same one).  That response would be before anyone can do any other responses, such as slipping a dominant in between the deactivation and reactivation of Lampstand, for example.

Or, maybe this should be legal: Darius's Decree to discard, Urim, Holy Grail.

That last option just doesn't sit right.

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #17 on: September 09, 2009, 03:33:16 PM »
0
Hey,

Lampstand was active, yes.  Since it's not an optional use Artifact like DD and GotM, LoTS probably isn't a good example to illustrate your point.

I realize that Lampstand is different.  Let me try a different example.

I have Darius' Decree active.  My prep phase starts.  I play Christian Martyr to kill a hero in your territory.  You want to use Brass Serpent to heal the hero but you can't because I have Darius' Decree active.  I put the hand discard lost soul into a site and you discard your Brass Serpent.  I then activate a new artifact.  If the opponent cannot play enhancements part Darius' Decree works between Christian Martyr and putting the Lost Soul into the site, then shouldn't the discard to kill set aside people part work too?

Maybe the best option would be to deactivate all of your artifacts automatically at the beginning of the prep phase, and then you could immediately respond with the activation of an artifact (including the same one).  That response would be before anyone can do any other responses, such as slipping a dominant in between the deactivation and reactivation of Lampstand, for example.

I do like the flexibility of being able to do things during the preparation phase in any order.  This kinda goes back to when we had a separate artifact activation phase (which I guess wasn't really all that bad).  But it does seem like it may be the only option if we're not comfortable with Darius's Decree to discard, Urim, Holy Grail.

If you are using Darius' Decree or Holy Grail or whatever at the beginning of your prep phase before activating a new artifact, it means that you didn't use the artifact during your previous turn, which in my mind means that I don't see a problem with it.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #18 on: September 09, 2009, 04:55:18 PM »
0
Dominants should have the highest "level of precedence" in the game.  If you attack me with a character, and I block with Saphira to make it FBN while having Unknown Nation turned on, then you should be able to decide that now that the battle is FBN, that me adding in a 2nd EC would be very hard to get past, and therefore you want to play DoN on my art.
Repeated as it seemed to get lost in the shuffle, and I'd appreciate some other people weighing in on this issue.

Offline Sean

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4025
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Darius' Decree vs Set Aside
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2009, 06:21:00 PM »
0
 :bump:
Was there a final conclusion to this discussion?
May you prosper greatly!
Daniel 4:1b

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal