Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
Any card that returns to deck, hand, or discard pile is returned to face value when they enter play again. The one "exception" is cards like King Amaziah, Jephthah, or Holy Grail that have a once or twice per game ability. If they are shuffled and then returned to play, they are still considered to have used their abilities from before they were shuffled.
Quote from: Professoralstad on September 23, 2011, 03:30:35 PMAny card that returns to deck, hand, or discard pile is returned to face value when they enter play again. The one "exception" is cards like King Amaziah, Jephthah, or Holy Grail that have a once or twice per game ability. If they are shuffled and then returned to play, they are still considered to have used their abilities from before they were shuffled.One other exception is that if a card has been set aside, it keeps "has been set aside" status.
One other exception is that if a card has been set aside, it keeps "has been set aside" status.
Quote from: Chronic Apathy on September 23, 2011, 04:54:55 PMOne other exception is that if a card has been set aside, it keeps "has been set aside" status.I hadn't heard this. Do you have a quote from the REG or a link to a thread with that ruling?
It was during Irish_Luck and I's game with Eric the Wolfe and his dad in Teams. I can't recall if we got a ruling or not, but they were both adamant that "has been set-aside" remains on the card for the remainder of the game, so I went with it, though I thought it was pretty stupid. If this isn't true, I demand a recount of that tournament.
Quote from: Chronic Apathy on September 24, 2011, 01:03:57 AMIt was during Irish_Luck and I's game with Eric the Wolfe and his dad in Teams. I can't recall if we got a ruling or not, but they were both adamant that "has been set-aside" remains on the card for the remainder of the game, so I went with it, though I thought it was pretty stupid. If this isn't true, I demand a recount of that tournament.I would prefer a more solid foundation for this ruling before having this exception to a relatively simple rule. Anyone else have any knowledge of this?
It's not. The rules say it's returned to face value. a card cannot be returned to face value and have has been set aside status. It's like it's another copy of the card.