Cactus Web Site special offer: Orders over $75 will receive a free Angel of God 2023 National Promo card while supplies last.
There is no rule or precedent that says cards are treated differently when played in side battles.
Again, what rule are you using that says conversion, when played in side battles, doesn't cause the target to be losing by removal?
Battle resolution for side battles is played the same as normal battles.
There aren't separate rules for side battles because the rules for normal battles apply just the same.
Quote from: Sean on December 04, 2009, 05:24:19 PMBattle resolution for side battles is played the same as normal battles.Apparently not?Quote from: Sean on December 04, 2009, 05:24:19 PMThere aren't separate rules for side battles because the rules for normal battles apply just the same.Except that there have to be, otherwise side battles wouldn't work at all since they don't have 2 sides (at the beginning, at least).
That is a definition of what a side battle is, not the rules for carrying it out. The rules for initiative and battle resolution are the same unless stated otherwise. Can anyone show me where they are stated otherwise?
Well even if they are not stated otherwise we cannot assume they are the same.
There really should be a separate distinction made for side battles.
Why doesn't it apply in side battles? Where is this stated? As I said before, we are bound to the rules set forth for normal battles because there are not specific rules for side battles.
"A converted character in an illegal situation must withdraw to its owners territory (e.g., a Hero blocking a rescue attempt resulting from an Evil Character being converted)."
Quote from: Sean on December 04, 2009, 07:14:50 PMWhy doesn't it apply in side battles? Where is this stated? As I said before, we are bound to the rules set forth for normal battles because there are not specific rules for side battles.If the quote Maly said was written for the new REG is true, then it wouldnt apply to side battles for one reason.You dont rescue or block in a side battle.
For example, someone mentioned gold shield. If I use gold shield on a hero in battle, to change him to a different brigade, he wouldn't be removed, would he?
Sorry for the terribly long post. :O
asked if they could use Unknown Nation to bring an EC into a side battle between two heroes if the holder let his hero die. Based on the wording of the special ability it made sense. The "blah blah blah" PTB-explanation was that once a battle starts as hero vs EC, here vs hero, or EC vs EC, it stays that way.
If my EC is converted in a rescue attempt or battle challenge, then my EC becomes a hero. Heroes cannot block rescue attempt or battle challenge, so the character is removed from battle. The removal is not a result of a conversion ability. A convert ability does not have a "return to territory" as part of it. The removal is because of the RULE that heroes don't block rescue attempts or battle challenges.There is no rule that says heroes can't fight ECs in side battles. Just because they don't typically start that way doesn't mean they can't become that way.As further evidence on my side of the argument, Gold Shield converts a hero to a different brigade and does not result in losing by removal. Thus, it is NOT the convert ability that causes removal. It is the game rule that heroes don't block. But once again, there is no rule disallowing ECs from fighting heroes in side battles. I would not be surprised to see a card that begins such a side battle in the coming years.
I would not be surprised to see a card that begins such a side battle in the coming years.