« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats  (Read 1563 times)

Offline Mr.Hiatus

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats
« on: July 16, 2009, 05:00:07 AM »
0
Ok I have a very controversial ruling for my deck. Pretty much it is supposed to work one way but I think it will get ruled against otherwise and I need an official judge or host or playtester that knows what he is talking about that is NOT going to nationals to pm me.
Logged

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2009, 07:57:58 AM »
0
Just email Rob.  I'm sure he'll give you an official ruling that will stand at Nats.
Logged
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2009, 10:00:47 AM »
0
Yeah, and then pull out the email right in the middle of your game against Kirk.

Totally kidding, but it would be funny :)
Logged

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5487
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2009, 10:06:37 AM »
0
From experience you would also be OK to PM/e-mail The Schaef, Bryon, or Mike B. I've sent them pre-Nats top secret ruling questions before, and they have never betrayed my confidence.

Quote from: Prof Underwood on July 16, 2009, 10:00:47 AM
Yeah, and then pull out the email right in the middle of your game against Kirk.

Totally kidding, but it would be funny :)

That would be totally excellent.
Logged

Offline frisian9

  • Official Playtester
  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
  • So let it be written, so let it be done.
    • Pittsbugh Playgroup
Re: Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2009, 09:47:23 PM »
0
I will not be able to attend Nats. Even thought I think that has nothing to do with who may review your deck, I am available to answer questions or check your deck. Send me email.

Mike
Logged
----------------------------------------------------------
Keeper of the REG (www.redemptionreg.com

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2009, 10:29:13 PM »
0
Im not going. I may not be a "veteran" but I'll still take a stab at it.
Logged

Offline redemption99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2907
  • God's Beautiful Creation
    • Unleavened Bread Ministries
Re: Controversial Ruling, I need a veteran that is NOT going to nats
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2009, 10:36:04 PM »
0
you can always ask me ;D
Logged
~Chris

"Trust in the Lord and He shall guide your ways."

The End IS Near
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal