Author Topic: Coliseum clarifications  (Read 1707 times)

Offline Crashfach2002

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+145)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3058
    • -
    • East Central Region
Coliseum clarifications
« on: May 13, 2016, 09:07:01 AM »
0
Since Coliseum "negates" protection, it Foreign Wive's would still be protected if opponent has drawn 5 cards.  Also I'm guessing that conditional CBN things will still be tossed, like Spirit as a Dove, Cannot be Negated if John the Baptist is in play.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2016, 09:21:06 AM »
0
I think your first question is asking if Coliseum can negate Foreign Wives protection? If that's what you're asking the answer is no.

Coliseum will toss any Enhancement with the phrase "cannot be negated" in the special ability. It has to use the words in quotes exactly though.

Cards like Authority of Christ that use old wording like "May not be interrupted, negated, or prevented" will not be tossed. Even though the card itself cannot be negate it does not have the phrase in quotes on Coliseum.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Crashfach2002

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+145)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3058
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2016, 09:38:13 AM »
+1
So I guess I didn't word those good.  I was trying to make sure I got the answers right and just confirming.  FW would not be negated, and Spirit as a Dove would be tossed be it does say cannot be negated.  Thanks for the clarification on the old wording because I would be tossing those too!

Offline h20tor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 254
  • чирок...
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2016, 09:38:31 AM »
0
It has to use the words in quotes exactly though.

Cool, but I have a feeling that will come up a LOT in tournaments. I can hear the 'JUDGE' now.  ;D
Meanwhile in Iowa...

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2016, 09:43:07 AM »
0
We tried to come up with a way for Coliseum to clearly toss all cards that are CBN. Despite quite a bit of effort we didn't figure out a way to do it in the amount of space we have available for the SA.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline kram1138

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2016, 10:03:10 AM »
0
I think it's better like this anyways. It gives it more variety
postCount.Add(1);

Offline ChristianSoldier

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2016, 02:56:12 PM »
0
We tried to come up with a way for Coliseum to clearly toss all cards that are CBN. Despite quite a bit of effort we didn't figure out a way to do it in the amount of space we have available for the SA.

Couldn't you have just said, "Toss all cards that Cannot be Negated" or "Toss all cards that have the "Cannot be Negated modifier"
If you are reading this signature, thank a physicist.

Offline Unnamed

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42
    • North Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2016, 03:05:06 PM »
0
Cards like Authority of Christ that use old wording like "May not be interrupted, negated, or prevented" will not be tossed. Even though the card itself cannot be negate it does not have the phrase in quotes on Coliseum.

Is there a play-as on AoCP, and if there is wouldn't that be considered the card's exact wording?

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2016, 03:18:49 PM »
0
Couldn't you have just said, "Toss all cards that Cannot be Negated" or "Toss all cards that have the "Cannot be Negated modifier"

Both of those options were considered. The issue with the first was cards that are "conditional" CBN would have created problems. For example, a card that says "Cannot be negated by an evil card" can still be negated by a Gamaliel's Speech played as a good enhancement so it isn't always CBN even if the opponent has no possible way to negate it. We also thought about using the modifier language but decided against that as well--I don't remember the reasoning off hand, I would have to go back and look (unless Gabe or John recall).
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2016, 05:11:03 PM »
0
Hopefully because tossing cards played on Michael et.  was the opposite of my intent!
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2016, 05:20:08 PM »
0
Hopefully because tossing cards played on Michael et.  was the opposite of my intent!

That too...we did not want to create "automatic TOSS" Heroes in Michael, Thomas and Paul.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Xonathan

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1363
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2016, 05:25:21 PM »
0
Why not? Hahahaha that sounds awesome.
Look to the Lord and his strength; seek his face always.
1 Chronicles 16:11

kariusvega

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2016, 08:26:16 PM »
0
so aocp wiki says

   
Discard all Evil Characters in play. May not be interrupted, negated, or prevented.

Play-As
Discard all Evil Characters in play. Cannot be negated.

just wondering if this is actually meaning it and other cards with other wording which are now or would be worded now in the 'new language' "Cannot be negated" are tossed with Coliseum?

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2016, 08:32:29 PM »
0
so aocp wiki says

   
Discard all Evil Characters in play. May not be interrupted, negated, or prevented.

Play-As
Discard all Evil Characters in play. Cannot be negated.

just wondering if this is actually meaning it and other cards with other wording which are now or would be worded now in the 'new language' "Cannot be negated" are tossed with Coliseum?

No. A Play-as doesn't change anything about the card (i.e. what wording is present or not) it just gives a (for most) simpler explanation on how to play the card. So AoCP even with a Play-as doesn't have the wording "Cannot be Negated" even if it has the effect "Cannot be Negated".
Just one more thing...

kariusvega

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #14 on: May 13, 2016, 08:34:04 PM »
0
okay cool yeah i could see why it would be confusing

kariusvega

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Coliseum clarifications
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2016, 08:34:57 PM »
-1
So I guess I didn't word those good.  I was trying to make sure I got the answers right and just confirming.  FW would not be negated, and Spirit as a Dove would be tossed be it does say cannot be negated.  Thanks for the clarification on the old wording because I would be tossing those too!

you're not the only one! when i playtested it with the creator, Daniel, he told me AoCP would be tossed! ha!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal