Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
This brings up an interesting question for me though... If I was to search for, but not play AoCP... and play it via initiative, and my opponent negates the search, would AoCP return to my deck, allowing me to use it twice in the same game?
No one would ever do that. Negating the search would be pointless, because they would still be dead from AoCP. And they wouldn't want you to get it back to play twice in the same game.
Quote from: Lamborghini_diablo on June 21, 2010, 02:53:30 PMThis brings up an interesting question for me though... If I was to search for, but not play AoCP... and play it via initiative, and my opponent negates the search, would AoCP return to my deck, allowing me to use it twice in the same game?No one would ever do that. Negating the search would be pointless, because they would still be dead from AoCP. And they wouldn't want you to get it back to play twice in the same game.
Quote from: Prof Underwood on June 21, 2010, 02:56:19 PMQuote from: Lamborghini_diablo on June 21, 2010, 02:53:30 PMThis brings up an interesting question for me though... If I was to search for, but not play AoCP... and play it via initiative, and my opponent negates the search, would AoCP return to my deck, allowing me to use it twice in the same game?No one would ever do that. Negating the search would be pointless, because they would still be dead from AoCP. And they wouldn't want you to get it back to play twice in the same game.A lot of my questions in ruling debates don't make a ton of sense in a game, but I like to have a solid understanding of the rules.So, would negating a search like this return the card to deck?
Author
Topic: Does a dominant get "negated" if the enh used to play it does? (Read 1009 times)
