Cactus Game Design Message Boards

For Besieging the City, it is your opponents next turn. And I have no clue about your other question.

In the same vein as the first question, who is the "next player" in a 2P game for the evil enhancement False Dreams?

False Dreams - Next player may not make a rescue attempt his next turn.

As I have stated in previous threads, ultimately everything is up to the host. We have made so many exceptions to things that are both written and unwritten over the years, that no host can truly be held at fault for a ruling error in the heat of the moment. As players, we need to accept the host's authority with grace and understanding. Everybody makes mistakes.

Old cards like Beseiging the City, and even older cards like False Dreams, usually only appear in Booster Draft, where I tend to forgo the "literal" translations of SAs and stick to their contextual meaning. BD is such a fun and nostalgic category that should not be weighed down with wording errors from long ago. Admittedly it can also be fun to see how an older card's wording can be made more useful in the modern meta, but if it works against the holder, then I tend to "let it go." 

Regarding mistakes, I will occasionally go back to correct an error, even if the players have started the next turn, if it was an important game-changing error. Minor errors will not be reversed if the turn has already passed. However, these decisions are based on my discretion, and I see no problem with that. There is no way to write out all possible scenarios and resolutions that a host may face into the Host Guide. We just do the best we can. 

If this is true can Besieging the City please receive a 'play as' then?  Because what it is written to say is disappointingly completely different from how it is played.

Because what it is written to say is disappointingly completely different from how it is played.

Who actually plays Besieging the City the other way? There are certainly better ways to keep your opponent from drawing.