Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Red Warrior on February 12, 2013, 01:49:54 AM

Title: Bearing Bad News
Post by: Red Warrior on February 12, 2013, 01:49:54 AM
What's our definition of "as a result of this battle?".

Let's say I block a large FBTN-B chain, so I'm pretty much set on initiative with my blocking Naaman. I play bearing bad news, then Strange Fire, discarding another EC in territory. Does the affect of Strange Fire interact correctly with the "as a result of battle" clause to trigger the protect clause?

Bearing Bad News
"If a unique human evil character is discarded as a result of this battle, no lost soul may be rescued by a hero this turn"
Title: Re: Bearing Bad News
Post by: Professoralstad on February 12, 2013, 09:53:54 AM
Yep.
Title: Re: Bearing Bad News
Post by: RTSmaniac on February 12, 2013, 12:27:08 PM
sounds like a 3 for 1 in this scenerio. He spends 1 card for your 3 cards gaining a block. O.k. really a 2 and a half to 1 but really if they are spending more cards than you then eventually it will be in your favor which doesnt sound good. What a more like Deluge of Rain?
Title: Re: Bearing Bad News
Post by: Red Warrior on February 12, 2013, 03:42:22 PM
RTS,
Let's just say this isn't the actual scenario, but it answers what I need for some T2 ideas... but that belongs in another discussion.
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal