Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
If the trigger is only evaluated once, then given the wording on the card (barring an errata) once the number of evil cards is less than the number of good cards, you will keep discarding evil as long as there is an evil card that can be discarded.
Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on Today at 02:00:48 AMOkay so if the argument is # d/c'd evil cards, vs # targetted, what happens with a loaded dorkness? Two evil cards WILL hit the d/c pile and one of them wasn't included in the check....It would be standard Redemption targeting. You would only target The Darkness as one of the cards you are discarding with Balance. The face down evil card goes along for the ride, by game rule, even though it wasn't targeted. Any good player would do that all the time.
Even more reason to just make it completely instant.
Also, another fun situation.... what happens if you discard a raiders camp full of heroes? According to how I see this, you'd still discard X, with X being based on the good/evil ratio BEFORE you started to discard.
I Am Redemption: "Return your captured Heroes to your territory. Cannot be negated by an evil card."Just based on that card, I'd say captured heroes in RC are considered good cards. Also, people in RC/ Demonic Stronghold arent treated like Lost Souls either.
What about that phrase makes you think they are good?
Considering all of the in-game scenarios mentioned I really think we'll hardly ever see Balance bring balance to the table when it is played. Unfortunate.
Quote from: Professoralstad on February 27, 2010, 09:23:29 AMWhat about that phrase makes you think they are good? Perhaps the word "heroes?"
Captured cards retain their identifiers, and brigade is an identifier. That means we know what is evil and what is good.Mike
Quote from: frisian9 on February 28, 2010, 05:24:20 PMCaptured cards retain their identifiers, and brigade is an identifier. That means we know what is evil and what is good.MikeAlso, I thought this myth was dispelled when someone tried to use Arioch to discard a male, human (both identifiers) from territory that happened to be a captured character to put an LS under deck.
Actually this claim was reinforced when Arioch looked around and was prevented from doing anything at all because the other guy had a captured prophet (an identifier) sitting in his land of bondage.It's not the identifiers that were the issue in the Arioch case. Bryon made a distinction between targeting a card in the LoB and noticing a card in the LoB, and claimed this was important. (To this day see nothing but inconsistency in ruling the two differently.) Anywhoo... the ruling most definitely did not deal with identifiers somehow being lost on capture.
Well, ultimately, what he brought was one Jedi and no Sith.
read the leagacy of the jedi series there will be alot of dark momets like luke almost killing his nephew.
More like one wanna be Jedi. You can't force choke a guard and be lightside.