Author Topic: Asherah Pole  (Read 1171 times)

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Asherah Pole
« on: May 31, 2013, 09:37:01 PM »
0
Why is http://redemption.wikia.com/wiki/Asherah_Pole_(Ki) not able to be put into Solomon's Temple? The temple does not limit itself to temple artifacts through a play as or an Errata, in fact it says that it can hold any artifact that was found in the temple. While regrettable, an Asherah pole was erected within the temple on multiple occasions.
Just one more thing...

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Asherah Pole
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2013, 09:54:41 PM »
0
Another card seems to indicate that it can be held

EDIT:  The REG says no:

Quote
NOTE: Several items may be periodically found in the temple, but are not considered part of this category (e.g., Asherah Pole (Ki), Priestly Breastplate (CL), Priestly Breastplate (CU) or Priestly Breastplate (Pi), Priestly Crown (E), Urim and Thummim (Pi)).

But Glory of the Lord seems to indicate that it Asherah Pole can be held there:

Quote
Glory of the Lord
Place in territory. Holder's Solomon's Temple and the Artifact in it cannot be discarded or negated by an opponent. Discard this card if Asherah Pole is in holder's Solomon's Temple.

Can we get some clarity on what these cards mean, please?
« Last Edit: May 31, 2013, 10:03:00 PM by Redoubter »

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Asherah Pole
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2013, 10:02:16 PM »
0
Another card seems to indicate that it can be held

That doesn't necessarily indicate that it can be held.  It simply states what would happen if it were to be held, but makes no ruling that it can be so.
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline TechnoEthicist

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+46)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2156
  • My little knight
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Asherah Pole
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2013, 10:05:28 PM »
+1
If I recall, I seem to remember Asherah Pole used to be able to be in Solomon's Temple. But I think that changed around FooF...or was it Priests. Either way, Glory was one way to try and make Ash Pole not OP.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Asherah Pole
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2013, 10:09:37 PM »
+1
The Artifacts originally allowed in Solomon's Temple used to be more liberal and allowed items that were sometimes found there but not intended to go there, such as Ashera Pole. That's the reason that Glory of the Lord is worded the way it is. Upon the release of the Priests set, Cactus tightened the definition of Temple Artifacts to only include items that God ordained to go into the Temple. Thus the definition we currently have in the REG today.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Asherah Pole
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2013, 10:25:41 PM »
0
Sounds good, thanks for the responses to that, didn't start playing until after Priests was already out ;)

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: Asherah Pole
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2013, 01:39:01 PM »
0
The Artifacts originally allowed in Solomon's Temple used to be more liberal and allowed items that were sometimes found there but not intended to go there, such as Ashera Pole. That's the reason that Glory of the Lord is worded the way it is. Upon the release of the Priests set, Cactus tightened the definition of Temple Artifacts to only include items that God ordained to go into the Temple. Thus the definition we currently have in the REG today.

I understand why Asherah Pole isn't a temple artifact, that makes perfect sense. But Tempe artifacts weren't defined as such when the Temple was printed and it doesn't limit itself to temple artifacts, but rather to any artifact that was found there. I understand that a game rule is trumping the card's wording here, I'm just wondering why this rule was enacted. Were these few artifacts bothersome enough that a rule was needed to change the way the temple worked? It would have only worked with Solomon's temple and that follows the biblical account.

Just one more thing...

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal