Author Topic: Another JT Question (Read 4481 times)

3-Liner And Bags Of Chips · « **on:** September 07, 2010, 12:52:36 PM »

I had a question that I never got an answer to and some people around my way got confused on.

Since JT is a protect does it protect against revealing and forced drawing? IDR if this got answered or not but I remember the thread not being resolved.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #1 on:** September 07, 2010, 01:38:35 PM »

No and no atm. I think the PTB are discussing it, but from everything I've heard they're heavily leaning toward protection from removal not applying to draw abilities.

juhnkect · « **Reply #2 on:** September 07, 2010, 01:45:51 PM »

JT is officially a protect now? I knew they were thinking about it....

but its definitely moved from a prevent to a protect?

when did this happen?

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #3 on:** September 07, 2010, 03:04:19 PM »

Quote from: juhnkect on September 07, 2010, 01:45:51 PM

JT is officially a protect now?

Yes, JT is officially a protect.

TheJaylor · « **Reply #4 on:** September 07, 2010, 06:42:07 PM »

So HT is no longer useful against JT.

Nameless · « **Reply #5 on:** September 07, 2010, 06:44:36 PM »

what is 'HT' and JT

Lamborghini_diablo · « **Reply #6 on:** September 07, 2010, 07:06:18 PM »

HT = Harvest Time
JT = Jerusalem Tower

3-Liner And Bags Of Chips · « **Reply #7 on:** September 07, 2010, 09:56:54 PM »

Quote from: KoalaKingoFA on September 07, 2010, 06:42:07 PM

So HT is no longer useful against JT.

or W@tW. So as of right now revealing and forced drawing are still good with JT?

TechnoEthicist · « **Reply #8 on:** September 07, 2010, 10:28:21 PM »

Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 07, 2010, 03:04:19 PM

Quote from: juhnkect on September 07, 2010, 01:45:51 PM
JT is officially a protect now?
Yes, JT is officially a protect.

Don't make me start up my petition for Hez's ring again....

TheJaylor · « **Reply #9 on:** September 07, 2010, 10:35:17 PM »

Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on September 07, 2010, 09:56:54 PM

Quote from: KoalaKingoFA on September 07, 2010, 06:42:07 PM
So HT is no longer useful against JT.

or W@tW. So as of right now revealing and forced drawing are still good with JT?

W@tW?

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #10 on:** September 07, 2010, 11:21:38 PM »

woman at the well

3-Liner And Bags Of Chips · « **Reply #11 on:** September 08, 2010, 09:21:08 AM »

Quote from: TechnoEthicist on September 07, 2010, 10:28:21 PM

Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 07, 2010, 03:04:19 PM
Quote from: juhnkect on September 07, 2010, 01:45:51 PM
JT is officially a protect now?
Yes, JT is officially a protect.

Don't make me start up my petition for Hez's ring again....

As soon as I heard this ruling I was already upset that Hezzy's Ring was only a prevent not a protect.

Master_Chi · « **Reply #12 on:** September 09, 2010, 09:24:05 AM »

Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on September 08, 2010, 09:21:08 AM

Quote from: TechnoEthicist on September 07, 2010, 10:28:21 PM
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 07, 2010, 03:04:19 PM
Quote from: juhnkect on September 07, 2010, 01:45:51 PM
JT is officially a protect now?
Yes, JT is officially a protect.

Don't make me start up my petition for Hez's ring again....

As soon as I heard this ruling I was already upset that Hezzy's Ring was only a prevent not a protect.

I would say that HSR should be made a protect also, but that would be consistent.....

3-Liner And Bags Of Chips · « **Reply #13 on:** September 09, 2010, 10:03:05 AM »

Quote from: Master_Chi on September 09, 2010, 09:24:05 AM

Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on September 08, 2010, 09:21:08 AM
Quote from: TechnoEthicist on September 07, 2010, 10:28:21 PM
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 07, 2010, 03:04:19 PM
Quote from: juhnkect on September 07, 2010, 01:45:51 PM
JT is officially a protect now?
Yes, JT is officially a protect.

Don't make me start up my petition for Hez's ring again....

As soon as I heard this ruling I was already upset that Hezzy's Ring was only a prevent not a protect.

I would say that HSR should be made a protect also, but that would be consistent.....

Me and my friend were like it shuld be a protect. It came out around the same time and it has the same exact wording. So now let us make this post to try and get Hezzy's ring to be a protect too!!

Master_Chi · « **Reply #14 on:** September 09, 2010, 10:10:53 AM »

Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on September 09, 2010, 10:03:05 AM

Quote from: Master_Chi on September 09, 2010, 09:24:05 AM
Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on September 08, 2010, 09:21:08 AM
Quote from: TechnoEthicist on September 07, 2010, 10:28:21 PM
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 07, 2010, 03:04:19 PM
Quote from: juhnkect on September 07, 2010, 01:45:51 PM
JT is officially a protect now?
Yes, JT is officially a protect.

Don't make me start up my petition for Hez's ring again....

As soon as I heard this ruling I was already upset that Hezzy's Ring was only a prevent not a protect.

I would say that HSR should be made a protect also, but that would be consistent.....
Me and my friend were like it shuld be a protect. It came out around the same time and it has the same exact wording. So now let us make this post to try and get Hezzy's ring to be a protect too!!

It would never catch on. Consistency is frowned upon in these here parts.

3-Liner And Bags Of Chips · « **Reply #15 on:** September 09, 2010, 10:13:49 AM »

I know but it is worth it to stand up for what you believe in xp even if it is futile sometimes

Master_Chi · « **Reply #16 on:** September 09, 2010, 10:15:47 AM »

Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on September 09, 2010, 10:13:49 AM

I know but it is worth it to stand up for what you believe in xp even if it is futile sometimes

Unless your legs don't work, then it's futile to attempt to un-futile something that is futile in the first place.

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #17 on:** September 09, 2010, 10:36:55 AM »

Quote from: Master_Chi on September 09, 2010, 10:10:53 AM

It would never catch on. Consistency is frowned upon in these here parts.

Actually consistency is highly valued by the PTB. However, sarcastic negativity is frowned upon.

3-Liner And Bags Of Chips · « **Reply #18 on:** September 09, 2010, 10:40:24 AM »

Quote from: Master_Chi on September 09, 2010, 10:15:47 AM

Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on September 09, 2010, 10:13:49 AM
I know but it is worth it to stand up for what you believe in xp even if it is futile sometimes

Unless your legs don't work, then it's futile to attempt to un-futile something that is futile in the first place.

Whaaaa!!!

Master_Chi · « **Reply #19 on:** September 09, 2010, 10:44:18 AM »

Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 09, 2010, 10:36:55 AM

Quote from: Master_Chi on September 09, 2010, 10:10:53 AM
It would never catch on. Consistency is frowned upon in these here parts.
Actually consistency is highly valued by the PTB. However, sarcastic negativity is frowned upon.

Apparently sarcasm carries through better on the Cactus Message Boards than on Facebook statuses and Wall posts...

News:

Author Topic: Another JT Question (Read 4481 times)

Lamborghini_diablo