Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
Yep. Moses' effect wasn't stopped so it continues to affect the field.
I've heard various answers about whether cards like that start a new battle phase or just a new battle. Is there a difference between Ambush and Grapes, etc?
Also, if they bring in Moses for the second battle, does it remain FBTN when it goes back to the original battle? I've heard no on that which is part of the confusion, I think. It seems weird to transfer one direction and not the other and I can never seem to remember which way does what when this comes up.
Wait, are u saying that ambush the city is a 'new battle phase' or not?
In the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases. In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.
Ambush the City is not a side battle card. It does create a new battle phase.
QuoteIn the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases. In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.QuoteAmbush the City is not a side battle card. It does create a new battle phase.Wut?
That doesn't really seem to make sense since another Elder agreed with me, that it's a side battle...It seems to me that the Battle phase did not end.
Maybe I am missing something but they seem to be in agreement, both are saying Moses FBTN carry's over into battle 2.
Hey,Quote from: galadgawyn on May 15, 2012, 02:33:58 PMI've heard various answers about whether cards like that start a new battle phase or just a new battle. Is there a difference between Ambush and Grapes, etc? Side battle cards start a second battle in the same battle phase. Cards that create a new normal battle (good vs evil) create a new battle phase for the new battle. In the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases. In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.Tschow,Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly
If Moses is brought in for the second battle, he negates anything still in play for the duration of the original battle (not the cards from that battle because they are set aside, but a placed enhancement like Herod's Treachery in a territory would be negated until the end of the original battle). He prevents abilities for the duration of the second battle. When the second battle ends Moses' ability ends and the original battle resumes with Moses' ability no longer in effect.
Quote from: megamanlan on May 15, 2012, 04:25:05 AMYep. Moses' effect wasn't stopped so it continues to affect the field.Mega is correct.
If Moses was in the original battle then I believe his FBTN would carry into AtC's new battle phase since that battle phase is nested inside the original phase which means Moses' effect hasn't ended yet. That is the difference between him originating in the first battle versus the second battle.
Quote from: browarod on May 16, 2012, 12:48:28 AMIf Moses was in the original battle then I believe his FBTN would carry into AtC's new battle phase since that battle phase is nested inside the original phase which means Moses' effect hasn't ended yet. That is the difference between him originating in the first battle versus the second battle.Based on it being a new battle phase (arguing that side just because I can see both sides), it shouldn't. If it is a different phase as SirNobody suggests, then FBTN would not transfer, just like he suggests FBTN from the second battle would not transfer. Different phase, so no shared abilities.