Author Topic: Ambush the City and Moses  (Read 4107 times)

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Ambush the City and Moses
« on: May 15, 2012, 03:01:15 AM »
0
If I play AtC on Moses to set-aside all the characters in battle, then is the new battle still fbtn?


Ambush the City (Ki)
Type: Hero Enh. • Brigade: Yellow • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: If making a rescue attempt, set all cards in battle aside (regardless of immunity). Holder may begin a new rescue attempt against same player. Once new rescue attempt is completed, the original battle resumes as a battle challenge. Cannot be negated.
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2012, 04:25:05 AM »
0
Yep. Moses' effect wasn't stopped so it continues to affect the field.
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2012, 12:52:34 PM »
0
Yep. Moses' effect wasn't stopped so it continues to affect the field.

Mega is correct.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Scoobug

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
  • Just keep swimming
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2012, 01:37:15 PM »
0
My understanding is that unless it is negated the FBTN status stays present for the rest of the battle. Correct?
Jude is red, Seth is blue, I like Redemption, how about you?

Offline galadgawyn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2012, 02:33:58 PM »
0
I've heard various answers about whether cards like that start a new battle phase or just a new battle.  Is there a difference between Ambush and Grapes, etc? 


Also, if they bring in Moses for the second battle, does it remain FBTN when it goes back to the original battle?  I've heard no on that which is part of the confusion, I think.  It seems weird to transfer one direction and not the other and I can never seem to remember which way does what when this comes up.

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2012, 03:16:10 PM »
0
Hey,

I've heard various answers about whether cards like that start a new battle phase or just a new battle.  Is there a difference between Ambush and Grapes, etc? 

Side battle cards start a second battle in the same battle phase.  Cards that create a new normal battle (good vs evil) create a new battle phase for the new battle.  In the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases.  In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.

Quote
Also, if they bring in Moses for the second battle, does it remain FBTN when it goes back to the original battle?  I've heard no on that which is part of the confusion, I think.  It seems weird to transfer one direction and not the other and I can never seem to remember which way does what when this comes up.

If Moses is brought in for the second battle, he negates anything still in play for the duration of the original battle (not the cards from that battle because they are set aside, but a placed enhancement like Herod's Treachery in a territory would be negated until the end of the original battle).  He prevents abilities for the duration of the second battle.  When the second battle ends Moses' ability ends and the original battle resumes with Moses' ability no longer in effect.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2012, 03:33:20 PM »
0
Wait, are u saying that ambush the city is a 'new battle phase' or not?
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2012, 03:43:07 PM »
0
Not. It's battleception.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2012, 03:49:26 PM »
0
Hey,

Wait, are u saying that ambush the city is a 'new battle phase' or not?

Ambush the City is not a side battle card.  It does create a new battle phase.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2012, 04:01:45 PM »
0
Quote
In the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases.  In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.
Quote
Ambush the City is not a side battle card.  It does create a new battle phase.
Wut?
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2012, 04:24:07 PM »
0
Quote
In the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases.  In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.
Quote
Ambush the City is not a side battle card.  It does create a new battle phase.
Wut?

Ambush the city does not create a side battle, it sets the current battle aside and starts a new one.
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2012, 04:26:40 PM »
0
That doesn't really seem to make sense since another Elder agreed with me, that it's a side battle...
It seems to me that the Battle phase did not end.
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2012, 05:15:12 PM »
0
What Nobody seems to be saying is that AtC creates a new battle phase without ending the one in which it was played, "nested phases" he called it. The first phase doesn't end until the second phase completely finishes and the first battle resumes/completes.

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2012, 07:35:57 PM »
0
Wouldn't that mean that Moses' effect would still be active because the phase is not over against what SirNobody seemed to assume?
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2012, 08:27:13 PM »
0
That doesn't really seem to make sense since another Elder agreed with me, that it's a side battle...
It seems to me that the Battle phase did not end.

While I can see both sides, it has always been ruled by every judge and host in my region as SirNobody described.  And just because an Elder agrees on one side, once another disagrees they've got to resolve it.  Neither of us is 'right' until they make a unified ruling.

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2012, 08:35:56 PM »
0
I know that, so can maybe the Elders discuss this on the other side and come back w/ a ruling?
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2012, 08:58:38 PM »
0
Maybe I am missing something but they seem to be in agreement, both are saying Moses FBTN carry's over into battle 2.
In AMERICA!!

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2012, 09:13:25 PM »
0
Maybe I am missing something but they seem to be in agreement, both are saying Moses FBTN carry's over into battle 2.

I was thinking the exact same thing. Both elders seem to be in agreement from what I have seen.
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2012, 09:28:53 PM »
0
As far as I see, SirNobody is saying a new Battle Phase starts, and once a Phase ends/starts effects on the previous phase is stopped/completed.
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2012, 11:27:47 PM »
0
Hey,

I've heard various answers about whether cards like that start a new battle phase or just a new battle.  Is there a difference between Ambush and Grapes, etc? 

Side battle cards start a second battle in the same battle phase.  Cards that create a new normal battle (good vs evil) create a new battle phase for the new battle.  In the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases.  In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2012, 12:25:28 AM »
0
You bolded the wrong part.  This card is not a side-battle card, it starts a whole new battle (the second sentence in what you quoted), and thus results in new battle phases.

Quote
In the case of Ambush the City this results in nested battle phases.  In the case of Grapes it creates consecutive battle phases.
Quote
Ambush the City is not a side battle card.  It does create a new battle phase.
If Moses is brought in for the second battle, he negates anything still in play for the duration of the original battle (not the cards from that battle because they are set aside, but a placed enhancement like Herod's Treachery in a territory would be negated until the end of the original battle).  He prevents abilities for the duration of the second battle.  When the second battle ends Moses' ability ends and the original battle resumes with Moses' ability no longer in effect.

SirNobody is saying (as I've had it ruled in our area since I've been playing) that AtC creates a new battle phase, and FBTN does not carry over between the battles.  That's the discrepancy when compared to:

Yep. Moses' effect wasn't stopped so it continues to affect the field.

Mega is correct.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2012, 12:48:28 AM »
0
If Moses was in the original battle then I believe his FBTN would carry into AtC's new battle phase since that battle phase is nested inside the original phase which means Moses' effect hasn't ended yet. That is the difference between him originating in the first battle versus the second battle.

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2012, 01:20:58 AM »
0
If Moses was in the original battle then I believe his FBTN would carry into AtC's new battle phase since that battle phase is nested inside the original phase which means Moses' effect hasn't ended yet. That is the difference between him originating in the first battle versus the second battle.

Based on it being a new battle phase (arguing that side just because I can see both sides), it shouldn't.  If it is a different phase as SirNobody suggests, then FBTN would not transfer, just like he suggests FBTN from the second battle would not transfer.  Different phase, so no shared abilities.

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2012, 09:48:41 AM »
0
At least we're on the same page, but my opinion is that it's not a new battle phase, because it's an Enhancement starting a battle, I can explain later...
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Ambush the City and Moses
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2012, 01:40:59 PM »
0
If Moses was in the original battle then I believe his FBTN would carry into AtC's new battle phase since that battle phase is nested inside the original phase which means Moses' effect hasn't ended yet. That is the difference between him originating in the first battle versus the second battle.

Based on it being a new battle phase (arguing that side just because I can see both sides), it shouldn't.  If it is a different phase as SirNobody suggests, then FBTN would not transfer, just like he suggests FBTN from the second battle would not transfer.  Different phase, so no shared abilities.
It's a new phase within another phase. Abilities don't end when a new phase starts, then end when the current phase ends. There is nothing about starting a new phase while one is ongoing that would stop Moses' ability which is why it carries over into the second battle phase. However, the second phase does actually end before the first resumes so that's why Moses' ability when used in the second battle ends after the second battle phase completes and doesn't carry back to the original, first phase.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal