Author Topic: Negating enhancements that are no longer in battle  (Read 775 times)

Offline BJHOGUE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Negating enhancements that are no longer in battle
« on: July 26, 2013, 10:17:01 PM »
0
My question pertains to the awesome new cards like Lahmi's spear and Invoking terror.  My thought has always been if an enhancement is no longer in battle it cannot be negated.  Now the two cards I used as an example might be different, as in order for the Lahmi's spear to take effect it must first be discarded but Invoking terror's effect takes place before it is put under the deck.  Does the order affect anything.

he confusing thing is many negate enhancements do different things.

would the kings version of Ehud's dagger work and negate the cards?  as it specifies the last evil enhancement played?

Do cards like swords into plow shares negate those type of cards?  as soon as the ability completes (and does nothing since there are no cards to discard) wouldn't the character still be discarded? but what about other interrupts (that include a play ability after?

obviously cards like burning bush wouldn't negate those two cards because they aren't in battle and obviously cards that prevent enhancements like Moses would.

What are the pertinent rulings?


browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Negating enhancements that are no longer in battle
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2013, 10:57:29 AM »
0
If the enhancement would cause special initiative (removing your last character from battle) then you can play any negate that can target that type of card (in this case, any negate that can negate an evil enhancement). If you band heroes and they use Invoking Terror to underdeck one of the heroes then you would need initiative and a "negate last" (I believe) in order to be able to negate Invoking Terror (assuming it was played on a multicolor magician and underdecked).

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal