Author Topic: Add to Battle VS Play Ability  (Read 3861 times)

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #25 on: February 02, 2012, 07:37:52 PM »
0
So it's not your opinion that the REG quote you furnished in this thread is correct?

There are two sentences in the quote.  To which are you referring?
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #26 on: February 02, 2012, 07:44:26 PM »
0
If you disagree with one, the validity of the other is called into question. Do you support the REG quote or not?
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #27 on: February 02, 2012, 07:47:57 PM »
0
If I disagree with one, the validity of the entire REG is called into question.

However, if I agree with both knowing full well an overriding rule compensates for any lack in correct wording, then the REG is just fine.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #28 on: February 02, 2012, 07:53:13 PM »
0
The validity of the whole REG is not in question, but it seems every day another incorrect or misleading quote is found in an obscure corner of the document. There is a long-standing ruling that Perpetual Priesthood is not a banding card, so unless there is an announcement in the "new rules" thread, this contradictory REG quote (in the "clarifications" section, no less) does not reverse the ruling.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #29 on: February 02, 2012, 07:57:04 PM »
0
No ruling is reversed if I never know about it.  As far as I'm concerned, Perpetual Priesthood is a banding card based on the rulebook and REG as currently written.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2012, 08:00:04 PM »
0
No ruling is reversed if I never know about it.

Ignorance is bliss eh?

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2012, 08:03:51 PM »
0
No ruling is reversed if I never know about it.

Ignorance is bliss eh?

You're Canadian?
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline lp670sv

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1652
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Add to Battle VS Play Ability
« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2012, 08:05:38 PM »
0
No ruling is reversed if I never know about it.

Ignorance is bliss eh?

You're Canadian?

I play enough hockey to be Canadian.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal