« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Wat.  (Read 1483 times)

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Wat.
« on: November 17, 2010, 10:40:52 AM »
0
My opponent blocks me with Wandering Spirit. I play Grapes.

-Does Grapes starting a second rescue force me to end the first battle?





Wandering Spirit (TP)
Type: Evil Char. • Brigade: Orange • Ability: 3 / 4 • Class: None • Special Ability: Reveal the bottom card of deck. If it is a demon, put it in your territory. May band to a generic demon. If your demon is discarded, place it beneath deck instead. Cannot be negated. • Play As: Reveal the bottom card of deck. If it is a demon, place it in your territory. May band to a generic demon. If your demon is being discarded, place it beneath deck instead. Cannot be negated. • Identifiers: Generic NT Male Demon • Verse: Luke 11:24 • Availability: Thesaurus ex Preteritus booster packs ()
See also:

Grapes of Wrath (TP)
Type: Lamb • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Discard an evil card in battle to shuffle all remaining characters in battle into owners’ decks. If the current rescuer doesn't have the most Redeemed Souls, he may begin a new battle. • Play As: Discard an evil card in battle to shuffle [return] all remaining characters in battle into owners’ decks. If the current rescuer doesn't have the most Redeemed Souls, he may begin a new battle. • Identifiers: None • Verse: Revelation 19:15 • Availability: Thesaurus ex Preteritus booster packs ()
Logged

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Wat.
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2010, 10:49:06 AM »
+2
Actually, I'm pretty sure based upon the recent instead rulings, playing Grapes with Wandering Spirit affecting the Orange demons results in it being basically another AoTL. It wont shuffle anyone else, and you don't get a new battle.
Logged
www.covenantgames.com

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Wat.
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2010, 10:55:22 AM »
0
That's correct. Grapes on Wandering Spirit does not shuffle anything or start any new RA's.
Logged
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Wat.
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2010, 11:18:21 AM »
+1
+1 Wandering Spirit is put on the bottom of the deck "instead" of being discarded.  And since Grapes of Wrath has a cost of the discard in order to gain the benefit of shuffling the other characters, and since no evil card actually was discarded, therefore there is no shuffling.

As for the last sentence allowing a new battle, I am less sure.  My leaning would be to allow a 2nd battle if the player chooses.  However, if the first battle ended up a successful rescue attempt (by getting rid of Wandering Spirit), then the 2nd battle would be limited to merely being a battle challenge rather than a 2nd rescue attempt.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 02:45:49 PM by Prof Underwood »
Logged

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Wat.
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2010, 11:58:49 AM »
0
I understand that it becomes AOTL. I'm just wondering if Grapes ends the battle (assuming Pol is wrong, and I do get to start a new battle.)
« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 12:02:44 PM by Rawrlolsauce! »
Logged

Offline Josh

  • Trade Count: (+46)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3187
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Wat.
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2010, 12:09:17 PM »
+1
The errata now says "If no heroes are in battle..." as a requirement to start a second battle.  Since there was no shuffle, the heroes are still in battle, and therefore there is no new rescue attempt.
Logged
If creation sings Your praises so will I
If You gave Your life to love them so will I

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Wat.
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2010, 12:11:31 PM »
0
It is marked as a play as. Disregard erratas that are labeled as play as.

EDIT: Nevermind. THe play as doesn't even say that (I didn't read it....). Although I do remember Justin posting about it......
« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 12:15:32 PM by Rawrlolsauce! »
Logged

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Wat.
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2010, 12:17:36 PM »
0
Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on November 17, 2010, 12:11:31 PM
It is marked as a play as. Disregard erratas that are labeled as play as.

EDIT: Nevermind. THe play as doesn't even say that (I didn't read it....). Although I do remember Justin posting about it......


Official Errate here.  jmhartz is correct.
Logged
In AMERICA!!

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Wat.
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2010, 02:46:30 PM »
0
Quote from: jmhartz on November 17, 2010, 12:09:17 PM
The errata now says "If no heroes are in battle..." as a requirement to start a second battle.  Since there was no shuffle, the heroes are still in battle, and therefore there is no new rescue attempt.
+1 Good point.  Thanks for remembering that.  This is correct.
Logged

Offline Ammian

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
  • The Inquirer strikes again
Re: Wat.
« Reply #9 on: November 19, 2010, 12:04:19 AM »
0
Quite true, quite true.
Logged
"Peace is not the absence of fear, but the presence of God." -Chris Vroon
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal