Author Topic: T.O.S.S: The Official Set Smackdown (Read 20436 times)

Professoralstad · « **Reply #50 on:** May 29, 2013, 04:31:14 PM »

Drrek and Isildur, I don't have your votes on the site issue.

I would guess you'd both probably be C or E, but I don't want to presume. Maybe you like a challenge...

browarod · « **Reply #51 on:** May 29, 2013, 04:38:00 PM »

Are we allowed to use multiple copies of each card from our set?

jbeers285 · « **Reply #52 on:** May 29, 2013, 04:41:42 PM »

ill renig and take limited unlimited a/b prophets
fail i didnt realize this was gone i guess ill go c/d decks
i vote c i guess

Professoralstad · « **Reply #53 on:** May 29, 2013, 04:51:47 PM »

Quote from: browarod on May 29, 2013, 04:38:00 PM

Are we allowed to use multiple copies of each card from our set?

As long as it makes a legal deck, yes.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #54 on:** May 29, 2013, 04:53:54 PM »

Quote from: jbeers285 on May 29, 2013, 04:41:42 PM

ill renig and take limited unlimited a/b prophets
fail i didnt realize this was gone i guess ill go c/d decks

Alrighty then. C/D it is.

Drrek · « **Reply #55 on:** May 29, 2013, 05:03:47 PM »

Quote from: Professoralstad on May 29, 2013, 04:31:14 PM

Drrek and Isildur, I don't have your votes on the site issue.

I would guess you'd both probably be C or E, but I don't want to presume. Maybe you like a challenge...

I go D, wanting a challenge has nothing to do with it. If we are trying to find out what the best set was, let the set use every tool at its disposal.

Gabe · « **Reply #56 on:** May 29, 2013, 06:10:20 PM »

Must we use the same deck for all of our games or can we modify it between opponents?

Professoralstad · « **Reply #57 on:** May 29, 2013, 06:13:54 PM »

Quote from: Professoralstad on May 29, 2013, 12:10:23 PM

How:
There is no need to check in decks, and you can use as many different decks as you want. You can "customize" your deck based on what your opponent is using before your game.

Gabe · « **Reply #58 on:** May 29, 2013, 06:29:59 PM »

Quote from: Professoralstad on May 29, 2013, 06:13:54 PM

Quote from: Professoralstad on May 29, 2013, 12:10:23 PM
How:
There is no need to check in decks, and you can use as many different decks as you want. You can "customize" your deck based on what your opponent is using before your game.

I did check the rules before posting that question. Apparently I still missed that.

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #59 on:** May 29, 2013, 06:50:29 PM »

I'll take Patriarchs if nobody else has snagged it.

Master KChief · « **Reply #60 on:** May 29, 2013, 07:18:34 PM »

Dat Noah/Covenant of Noah combo. Going hard in the paint.

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #61 on:** May 29, 2013, 07:24:07 PM »

You know it.

Too OP!

Isildur · « **Reply #62 on:** May 29, 2013, 07:40:50 PM »

I am cool with D.... So long as there is a rule or a gentlemens agreement between players NOT to use sites in a color the other player does not have access to...

Example would be since Gabe has picked the Warriors set he would not include Silver sites in his deck because I have no cards with the color Silver in the Blues and Greens.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #63 on:** May 29, 2013, 07:43:03 PM »

Quote from: Red Dragon Thorn on May 29, 2013, 07:24:07 PM

You know it.

Too OP!

Don't forget 3 plots in 4 games

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #64 on:** May 29, 2013, 07:46:03 PM »

Yeah, but only like 2 characters to play it on.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #65 on:** May 29, 2013, 07:55:03 PM »

Quote from: Isildur on May 29, 2013, 07:40:50 PM

I am cool with D.... So long as there is a rule or a gentlemens agreement between players NOT to use sites in a color the other player does not have access to...

Example would be since Gabe has picked the Warriors set he would not include Silver sites in his deck because I have no cards with the color Silver in the Blues and Greens.

I think that would be a good compromise. So for those players with Silver or Teal sites, does that seem fair? I believe the only set that has zero access to Silver sites is Isildur's set, and the only two sets with zero access to teal sites are Isildur's and I/J.

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on May 29, 2013, 07:43:03 PM

Quote from: Red Dragon Thorn on May 29, 2013, 07:24:07 PM
You know it.

Too OP!

Don't forget 3 plots in 4 games

Keep in mind it's a double elim tourney, so there will be at least 5 rounds to win.

wyatt_marcum · « **Reply #66 on:** May 29, 2013, 09:33:52 PM »

I'm fine with it, as long as I can change if the set I'm against can get in to them.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #67 on:** May 29, 2013, 11:03:03 PM »

Last but not least.

Womens- Ill take it.

Normal site rules please.

TheJaylor · « **Reply #68 on:** May 30, 2013, 09:41:32 AM »

Normal site rules.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #69 on:** May 30, 2013, 10:34:43 AM »

Quote from: wyatt_marcum on May 29, 2013, 09:33:52 PM

I'm fine with it, as long as I can change if the set I'm against can get in to them.

You can change your decks as many times as you'd like between rounds.

Well, the tournament has filled, with the possibility for needing a backup if Thomas Hunter determines he can't play. If anyone finds out they need to drop out, please let me know ASAP, so we can find a replacement.

If you have any preference on the seeding method, please let me know by Sunday night with your rankings. I will have the initial bracket setup on Sunday night.

I look forward to a fun tournament! Please PM me with questions.

Bobbert · « **Reply #70 on:** May 31, 2013, 12:06:26 AM »

As I am overbooked Friday and still not sure if RTS/hamachi is working for me, I am forced to step down. As much as I would like to play, I don't want to stick you guys short a player on Saturday night if it doesn't work.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #71 on:** May 31, 2013, 03:24:49 AM »

I'd be happy to fill that gap.

Professoralstad · « **Reply #72 on:** May 31, 2013, 10:36:19 AM »

Quote from: Westy on May 31, 2013, 03:24:49 AM

I'd be happy to fill that gap.

Excellent! Glad to see we are still good to go.

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #73 on:** May 31, 2013, 01:02:13 PM »

My rankings:

FooF
RoA
Disciples
Kings
I/J
Priests
Warriors
G/H
Pats
TxP
E/F
Women
A/B with prophets
Apostles
C/D
Angel Wars

Redoubter · « **Reply #74 on:** May 31, 2013, 09:41:25 PM »

Quote from: Prof Underwood on May 31, 2013, 01:02:13 PM

...
TxP
E/F
Women
A/B with prophets
Apostles
C/D
Angel Wars

I can't see how starter decks with starter (with maybe some new) doms and Angel Wars with actual themes and proper abilities could possibly be below TexP, which has a grand total of 1 actual battlewinner (playable on 2 characters), and 1 other potential battlewinner (if other cards aren't in play), where you must play with 43 cards out of only 60, and where the cards are spread across good brigades at a rate of 4-3-3-3-3-3-3 without any actual synergy. That said, my rankings are:

I/J
FooF
G/H
RoA
Disciples
Priests
E/F
Warriors
Kings
A/B with Prophets
Patriarchs
C/D
Angel Wars
Women
Apostles
TexP

News:

Author Topic: T.O.S.S: The Official Set Smackdown (Read 20436 times)

browarod

Warrior_Monk