Author Topic: Substitute Online Tournament (Read 223454 times)

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #950 on:** January 27, 2009, 06:52:21 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on January 27, 2009, 06:27:02 PM

Quote from: xCaLeBx on January 27, 2009, 06:25:13 PM
you really need tobe more clear for the 50th time I'm full...I'm not madbut ask before you sayits a tourney game

beat Rawr for my 3rd game of the week 5-4 in a very scary game and its all about the mouse clicking

I see a patern Week #1 win 3 Week #2 lose 3 Week #3 win 3 hmmmmmm
... You challenged me like 5 pages back... I didn't check because I assume when you challenge someone you wouldn't do 3 more games before said game.

oh dude yyou misunderstood that that was at captains REAL sorry

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #951 on:** January 27, 2009, 06:54:41 PM »

Quote from: Janissary on January 27, 2009, 06:51:52 PM

Beat Sauce 5-4 in a speed based drawfest.

Drawfest for you. How many times did you attack with Hur and Gifts of the Magi? 4, maybe 5?

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #952 on:** January 27, 2009, 06:56:35 PM »

I think it was 3-4. You had the one nice drawing combo, and pentecost was comming.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #953 on:** January 27, 2009, 06:57:29 PM »

Quote from: STAMP on January 27, 2009, 06:36:58 PM

Rawrlolsauce, PM your available times this week for our challenge. Thanks!

When did you challenge me? I don't seem to remember this :/. Let me look back.

EDIT: Apparently I didn't see your challenge (my "I accept" was intended for Caleb/Prof, I didn't see your post. I'll be more careful next time). Beings you issued the first Challenge, I'd assume yours counted and the others were OTS.

Meaning, the ones that counted were...

Stamp
Prof
and Caleb.

I apologize for my mistakes. Our game doesn't count (Jannisary), as I still have to play STAMP.

EDIT: STAMP just pointed out Caleb was listed as an "Optional" challenge. I'm SEVERELY confused now, that would make his not count.

*Waits for Soul Seeker*

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #954 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:10:45 PM »

I challenged so mine was mandatory but you just got mixed up by what I said

I was yelling at captain sorry for the mix up

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #955 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:13:29 PM »

Quote from: xCaLeBx on January 27, 2009, 07:10:45 PM

I challenged so mine was mandatory but you just got mixed up by what I said I was yelling at captain sorry for the mix up

That isn't what I'm talking about. If I did all my challenges, I would have 4 games.

Here is the order of events

STAMP Challenged
Prof Challenged
Caleb Challenged
I accepted Prof and Caleb, as I didn't see STAMP's post.
Jannisary Challenged
I DID NOT ACCEPT, BUT IT WAS LISTED AS OFFICIAL
I then played in this order
Prof
Caleb
Jannisary

From what I see, my game with Jannisary wouldn't count. However you're (Caleb) listed as an optional challenge on the front page, meaning my game against you (Caleb) wouldn't count.

EDIT: Wow. Apparently I didn't accept Jannisary's challenge; but Soul Seeker listed it as official. I'll wait for him, because in that case Jannisary's and my game wouldn't count

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #956 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:15:05 PM »

uhm that doesn't sound legitimate because that would be cheating me....

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #957 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:18:30 PM »

There several options here IMO:

Go by the official challenges at the beginning of the thread. In which case, My challnege as well as Prof's and Stamp's count. (good option IMO)

Go by order of played challenges. Stamp's is invalid (bad option IMO)

Penalize Sauce, give his 4 opponents wins (bad option IMO)

Other options (i can't think of any)

That's just what I think based on the first post of the thread.

Sauce your order of events is wrong upon research. the order I found is as follows:

Caleb Challenged
Prof Challenged
Sauce accepts Prof and Caleb
Jannisary Challenged
Stamp challenged
Sauce accepted
Games were listed as follows: Prof-w for sauce, official challenges: Janissary and Stamp possible games: caleb
then played in this order
Prof
Caleb
Jannisary

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #958 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:34:35 PM »

Quote

Sauce your order of events is wrong upon research. the order I found is as follows:

Caleb Challenged
Prof Challenged
Sauce accepts Prof and Caleb
Jannisary Challenged
Stamp challenged
Sauce accepted
Games were listed as follows: Prof-w for sauce, official challenges: Janissary and Stamp possible games: caleb
then played in this order
Prof
Caleb
Jannisary

Your right, I got STAMP's posts confused.

To simplify this, I hope we go by official challenges, meaning Caleb's wouldn't count.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #959 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:37:28 PM »

Ok, just making sure we have the order right. Thanks.

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #960 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:40:39 PM »

alright then Captain our game counted 5-3

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #961 on:** January 27, 2009, 07:43:21 PM »

In an epic 3 turn game, I lost to Gabe 5-2

Gabe · « **Reply #962 on:** January 27, 2009, 08:30:35 PM »

Quote from: Janissary on January 27, 2009, 07:43:21 PM

In an epic 3 turn game, I lost to Gabe 5-2

Hmmm, I'm not sure I'd describe it as epic but I sense a hint of sarcasm there...

Janissary and I both drew SoG/NJ right away and our game ended 5-2 in my favor. Hooray for revealer putting important cards on the bottom and people always forgetting what "super man" does.

I also played Red's challenge against me and won 5-0 in a game where he drew no defense (except sites).

Tsavong Lah · « **Reply #963 on:** January 27, 2009, 08:55:13 PM »

Quote

When did you challenge me? I don't seem to remember this :/. Let me look back.

I also challenged you about a page back. This might complicate things even further.

Gabe · « **Reply #964 on:** January 27, 2009, 09:09:36 PM »

You guys messing up your challenges are making this a real pain in the butt for Soul Seeker, who's running this tournament out of the goodness of his heart.

Starting next week and for the remainder of the current tournament I'm going to penalize anyone who posts an unofficial game or messes up their challenge(s) by playing or challenging more than 4 people. For each unofficial game posted or challenge "overlooked" I will penalize the guilty party by 1 entry in the Faithful Servant promo drawing.

I'm not doing this to be mean but to motivate everyone to follow the rules and pay attention. This is an easy system we have in place here. I think the people who do things right deserve a better chance to win the drawing. Hopefully that will be all of us.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #965 on:** January 27, 2009, 09:49:37 PM »

I vote you can only challenge for the current week

Tsavong Lah · « **Reply #966 on:** January 27, 2009, 09:56:09 PM »

That would be helpful.

soul seeker · « **Reply #967 on:** January 28, 2009, 10:13:55 AM »

Okay, here is why Caleb's challenge with Sauce is considered Optional: he challenged TWO people in one thread. In that 1 thread he listed Prof first (which I made official) and Sauce second (which I put as optional). So without going back and double checking here is what I have which I believe is most fair for everyone (including STAMP).

Caleb W over Captain (OTS)
Jani W over Sauce
Sauce still needs to play STAMP
Tsavong, I'm sorry you were too late with your challenge because Sauce was too popular this week.

*EDIT* Wow, I think this is a first! Sauce got challenged 5 times...he didn't use any of his challenges that I could tell. The above is probably the most fair for Stamp, but it would help if you challenged only one at a time and leave the rest as OTS if you want to play a 2nd or 3rd person in particular. I've ironed this out as much as possible.

Please, remember to challenge 1 person per post starting on Monday.
I will go back and look to make sure I got it right, but I'm confident that I did.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #968 on:** January 28, 2009, 10:22:05 AM »

Can we make a rule no challenging for a future week on this thread? That would help I think. If you want to play someone in the next week, you can always PM them.

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #969 on:** January 28, 2009, 10:24:13 AM »

except on Sunday you can challenge for the next week on Sunday you just can't play until Monday

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #970 on:** January 28, 2009, 10:25:55 AM »

No, period. Us doing that is what caused this whole situation IMO.

soul seeker · « **Reply #971 on:** January 28, 2009, 10:39:44 AM »

I agree, I would wait until Monday to start challenging. I may go ahead and make that official in the rules.

SirNobody · « **Reply #972 on:** January 28, 2009, 01:28:38 PM »

Hey,

Quote from: New Raven (trying to change) BR on January 26, 2009, 06:21:03 PM

again i challenge sir nobody and red

I accept.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Tsavong Lah · « **Reply #973 on:** January 28, 2009, 02:57:30 PM »

Well then, I challenge 77Matthew!

77matthew · « **Reply #974 on:** January 28, 2009, 07:18:35 PM »

Quote from: Tsavong Lah on January 28, 2009, 02:57:30 PM

Well then, I challenge 77Matthew!

I accept. When can you play?

News:

Author Topic: Substitute Online Tournament (Read 223454 times)

michael/michaelssword

Rawrlolsauce!

Rawrlolsauce!

michael/michaelssword

Rawrlolsauce!

michael/michaelssword

Rawrlolsauce!

michael/michaelssword

michael/michaelssword