Poll

What change made to a Redemption tournament among the following would be more desirable to you as a player and/or host?

Banning/Limiting cards
4 (7.1%)
Creating a card cycle
5 (8.9%)
Implementing a mulligan rule
11 (19.6%)
Using a best 2 of 3 system
8 (14.3%)
Adding a deck sideboard
8 (14.3%)
Checking in only one deck
10 (17.9%)
Leave stuff the way it is
10 (17.9%)

Total Members Voted: 49

Author Topic: POLL: Preference about potential changes used in TLG Tournaments.  (Read 17803 times)

Offline New Raven BR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6793
  • P.J.S. May 23rd 1956- May 18th 2012
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Redemption Xtreme League
Re: POLL: Preference about potential changes used in TLG Tournaments.
« Reply #50 on: March 25, 2015, 05:30:42 PM »
0
Quote
Creating a card cycle
can someone please explain this part to me? I don't understand whatsoever
A card cycle is like what Magic does for their primary categories: The only "valid" cards are ones from a subset of recent sets, something like from the last 2 years or whatever.

For Redemption that would mean something like all sets older than Priests are no longer tournament-legal. Or all sets older than Women, or older than G/H, something like that.
I don't like that idea. I don't play much and that would only exclude me and others who play with older cards from the game
Your biggest competition is YOURSELF

Offline uthminister [BR]

  • Youth Minister
  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2582
  • Jesus Loves Gamers!
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: POLL: Preference about potential changes used in TLG Tournaments.
« Reply #51 on: March 26, 2015, 03:59:02 PM »
+2
Thanks for everyone's input. The winner of the drawing for everyone who reported that they voted is...

Spoiler (hover to show)

Please send me a PM with your mailing address and I will be sending you a nice prize.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal