Author Topic: Thoughts on T3 format?  (Read 2524 times)

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Thoughts on T3 format?
« on: January 07, 2013, 11:27:15 PM »
0
Post here about thoughts/comments regarding the T3 format (60 card decks with equal good and evil, playing to 6 LSs). This can apply to people in or out of ROOT, as long as you've played games under the T3 rules. This is not a thread for people to say "that sounds awful, I'm never going to do that!" or "that sounds awesome, I might try that someday." The idea here is for people who have played games to give their input, which is why I am posting it in the ROOT forum (since all ROOT players used these rules this month).

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2013, 12:55:31 AM »
0
Alot more defense than im use to in deck building. Offence usually comes up short. Recursion is good. Not so much emphasis on SoG/NJ which I like. I think it could defiantly replace T1 multi.
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2013, 01:05:39 AM »
0
I really enjoyed T3 and like the idea of not relying on speed to get to SoG NJ.

I would like to see the use of multiple generics implemented still.
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Josh

  • Trade Count: (+46)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3187
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2013, 12:25:52 PM »
0
1.  Recursion can be key.  Hezekiah's Signet Ring, aside from dominants, is the most staple-like card in a T3 deck (in my opinion and in my T3 decks). 

2.  Decks are slower, but there is less of a "rush" to get through a deck.  The game's pace is more relaxed.

3.  Few unblocked rescue attempts.  Most battles also see an evil enhancement played too, if the blocker gets initiative.

4.  Soul drought still happens, but it hurts less as well.  (See number 7 below)

5.  Planning and efficiency are extremely important, but not quite the same way as T1.  In T1, choosing to attack with AUTO/Gideon instead of AUTO/Moses, and then having your opponent block with Uzzah, can make or break you.  In T3, you have to be ready to play the "long game"; having your RA stopped by Failed Objective  or DoU doesn't hurt so much, and depending on how the game plays out, could end up helping you.

6.  Having decks the same size is wonderful; no offense to the 21-Samaria decks, but if I'm playing T1, I don't want to play a 154 card deck, no matter what I am playing  :)

7.  Comebacks can happen, and I'd say they are easier to mount in T3 than T1.  You need to rescue an additional LS, plus both decks are forced to have defense; if you fall behind, you know your opponent's remaining deck isn't 30 good cards of drawing/searching/CBN discarding.

All in all, I loved my T3 experience.  It was a refreshing new look at T1 games in Redemption. 
If creation sings Your praises so will I
If You gave Your life to love them so will I

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2013, 06:37:32 PM »
0
I'm going to comment on this from the perspective of the Maryland playgroup that has been testing T3 since its conception, an idea that has evolved some as we've played.  We've also had one tournament for T3 already, and more will be coming soon once we can all get together.

First, we have been playing it as a MP category.  For one, very few of us enjoy T1-MP, and as others have pointed out there is ALWAYS a block to be had in this format (my brother won a Regional T1-MP with his only evil cards being Mayhem and Cupbearer, both used basically for souls and not actual blocking).

Second, we reduced the rescue limit from 6 to 5.  While this had been discussed a lot, due to the fact that it set it apart from the other types in a major way, we had an issue with time-outs, especially when we went to a MP category.  Even when we played 2P, two very good players who built formidable decks would time-out almost every game, and we didn't like this option for a tournament.  Given the increased number of blocks (and evil doms) when there are 3 and 4 players, the game is still not over with a SoG+NJ draw and we have found 5 souls is sufficient for a competitive game.

Third, we changed the deck size to 60-63.  The impetus was Haman's Plot.  Essentially, ripping a Plot would result in an illegal deck normally if the deck size was mandated at 60.  Alternatives were as discussed in this thread on the Type Three board I put up, but the best option that was agreed upon after play-testing was to change the deck size to 60-63 cards and use T2 rules on balancing a deck after a card is ripped.

On a side note there, I made another board for those play-testing the type as we were running it to discuss and post about tournament results (quiet given the holidays, will pick up soon).  The website is TypeThree.game-host.org.  If you want to sign up, just shoot me a PM afterwards so I can activate you (lots of spammers were joining :P).  We have a points system to determine a 'season winner', and if anyone wants to hold tournaments by the rules we're testing, they are free to :) There will be trophies and prizes (paid for by me) in the end :D

Now, on to discussion of gameplay :)

I agree that the slower pace of the game is very much better by my standards.  Less frantic, more fellowship, and more strategic.  All reasons why I like playing this game in the first place, so it's not really a surprise I like T3.

Also, love that there are very few unblocked rescues, and A LOT of battles that are more than 1 card being played.  Actual strategy is involved!

Similar-sized decks and the mandated balance definitely help to keep games interesting and encourages better deck design all around.  Speed hasn't been killed in T3 (which I think is good), but it is certainly limited and I enjoy that a lot.

slugfencer

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2013, 12:19:05 PM »
0
I liked the format better than T1 2player.
More balanced which made for more variety.
I like T2 better, and this format reminded me more of T2 with the balanced decks and going to 6 LS.
The only thing I didn't like was the size limit of 60 for the deck. Wished there were more options than 1 size. 

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2013, 08:21:11 AM »
0
I really enjoyed the T3 format.  I've always like the interaction of the battle phase in Redemption, and the format caused there to be a lot more of that in these games.  Both players had REAL defense (as in designed to stop rescues instead of just drawing cards or creating LSs for the offense).  Both players also had REAL offense (as in designed to rescue all game long instead of just a gimmick that works when your opponent decks out).

This combination made games feel like the way Redemption was actually designed to be played.  It was fun :)

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2013, 09:36:07 PM »
0
The only thing I didn't like was the size limit of 60 for the deck. Wished there were more options than 1 size.

Yeah, that was one of the reasons that we've gone to 60-63 cards when we're playing (the biggest being Plot).  That helps you not have a limited choice when it comes to neutral cards, especially (as that count MUST be even if you play 60).

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Thoughts on T3 format?
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2013, 12:42:17 PM »
0
I wasn't around for the T3 ROOT, but if people still have their decks I would enjoy giving it a try. Shoot me a message to let me know when you would be available. I'll try to get a deck ready sometime this weekend.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal