Author Topic: Feedback on Dom Cap (used in Nov/Dec ROOT) (Read 14918 times)

Captain Kirk · « **Reply #25 on:** November 04, 2011, 01:04:56 PM »

Well presented post Polarius. If GoYS was out of the equation, players would have to look to Lampstand + Temple for FA protection. There are enough counters to take out that combination that it would work out nicely if that were the only FA protection.

Kirk

slugfencer · « **Reply #26 on:** November 13, 2011, 11:19:28 PM »

Don't believe there were any "dom cap issues" in my root game w/pol. It was just a beatdown.

browarod · « **Reply #27 on:** November 13, 2011, 11:29:52 PM »

It's hard to leave feedback on this while the tournament is ongoing because I don't want to give away mine or my opponent's decks (even just knowing which dominants we have would be a sizable advantage for our future opponents).

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #28 on:** November 14, 2011, 01:46:06 AM »

I didn't notice any "dom cap" issues in my game tonight.

Quote from: browarod on November 13, 2011, 11:29:52 PM

It's hard to leave feedback on this while the tournament is ongoing because I don't want to give away mine or my opponent's decks

I don't want anyone giving anyone else's deck away. If you can't give feedback until the end of the month, that's OK. Please write it down somewhere though so that you won't forget it later

slugfencer · « **Reply #29 on:** November 15, 2011, 01:22:09 PM »

Don't believe there were any obvious "dom cap issues" in my root game w/Red.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #30 on:** November 15, 2011, 01:58:01 PM »

Dom cap didn't really matter in my game with Slug. I don't think it's betraying any secret to say that his deck was so huge he could have had more doms than actually exist :p

slugfencer · « **Reply #31 on:** November 16, 2011, 03:15:17 PM »

Tis no secret, but common knowledge!

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #32 on:** November 16, 2011, 10:10:59 PM »

Didn't matter in my second ROOT game either. I can build decks that function just fine with 7 or 8 Doms. I almost hope I'll play a speed deck at some point and see how that fares with only 7 of the 11.

browarod · « **Reply #33 on:** November 16, 2011, 10:53:48 PM »

I have a speed deck that I only had to remove 1 dominant from for the dom cap, and it hasn't seemed to affect much. If you don't stuff your decks full of doms to begin with 1)you can build speed decks easier (less cards to remove to get to 50, and 2) you aren't so reliant on them which makes your deck that much stronger.

katedid · « **Reply #34 on:** November 22, 2011, 11:17:44 PM »

May have made a differnece. Game may have been shorter. If I had more dominats my strategy would have been different. Its kinda hard to mention specifica without revealing which doms were played

megamanlan · « **Reply #35 on:** December 05, 2011, 01:48:20 AM »

I found that I dropped Mayhem from my Deck. I forsee that GoYS will probally leave decks making FA better. I think that it would make Mayhem less used as well, not to mention HT. I actually perfer not having a limit (mostly because I have a hard time to put very many doms in my deck)

theselfevident · « **Reply #36 on:** December 06, 2011, 12:10:23 AM »

Over all I like the idea of dom cap. If possible implement it.

megamanlan · « **Reply #37 on:** December 08, 2011, 11:51:10 PM »

I found that I would have liked to have my other Doms in my Deck there.

TheHobbit13 · « **Reply #38 on:** December 09, 2011, 12:40:12 AM »

I don't really like it. If you are not going to ban cards why restrict players from playing said cards?

Red · « **Reply #39 on:** December 09, 2011, 11:01:49 AM »

Quote from: TheHobbit13 on December 09, 2011, 12:40:12 AM

I don't really like it. If you are not going to ban cards why restrict players from playing said cards?

That's what I've wanted to say all along...

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #40 on:** December 09, 2011, 01:52:18 PM »

Quote from: TheHobbit13 on December 09, 2011, 12:40:12 AM

I don't really like it. If you are not going to ban cards why restrict players from playing said cards?

We already restrict sites anyway.

Drrek · « **Reply #41 on:** December 09, 2011, 01:53:22 PM »

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on December 09, 2011, 01:52:18 PM

Quote from: TheHobbit13 on December 09, 2011, 12:40:12 AM
I don't really like it. If you are not going to ban cards why restrict players from playing said cards?

We already restrict sites anyway.

And lost souls

cookie monster · « **Reply #42 on:** December 09, 2011, 02:12:08 PM »

Quote from: Drrek on December 09, 2011, 01:53:22 PM

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on December 09, 2011, 01:52:18 PM
Quote from: TheHobbit13 on December 09, 2011, 12:40:12 AM
I don't really like it. If you are not going to ban cards why restrict players from playing said cards?

We already restrict sites anyway.

And lost souls

So why not doms, there the most powerful.

christiangamer25 · « **Reply #43 on:** December 09, 2011, 02:36:41 PM »

this has to happen SPEED MUST DIE PERIOD

SomeKittens · « **Reply #44 on:** December 09, 2011, 02:52:55 PM »

Quote from: christiangamer25 on December 09, 2011, 02:36:41 PM

this has to happen SPEED MUST DIE PERIOD

Speed won' t die from this.

christiangamer25 · « **Reply #45 on:** December 09, 2011, 03:23:25 PM »

I'll attempt to kill speed, because I feel like no one else is trying to do so.*

* Edited to help get your message across since people ignore all caps. Try to keep the caps lock off Matt.

TheHobbit13 · « **Reply #46 on:** December 09, 2011, 04:24:31 PM »

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on December 09, 2011, 01:52:18 PM

Quote from: TheHobbit13 on December 09, 2011, 12:40:12 AM
I don't really like it. If you are not going to ban cards why restrict players from playing said cards?

We already restrict sites anyway.

Basically I am saying restrictions (and I am obviously talking about restrictions on cards or concepts that would not otherwise break the game like the site rule) are pointless unless you are going to fix the root of the problem but if banning is out of the question then the fewer restrictions the better. Make sense?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #47 on:** December 09, 2011, 04:25:14 PM »

Quote from: christiangamer25 on December 09, 2011, 03:23:25 PM

I'll attempt to kill speed, because I feel like no one else is trying to do so.*

* Edited to help get your message across since people ignore all caps. Try to keep the caps lock off Matt.

Andrew Wester (Ring Wraith), and Alex O both played last year with anti-speed decks (and Wraith pulled off third at nats).

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #48 on:** December 09, 2011, 04:31:35 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on December 09, 2011, 04:25:14 PM

Quote from: christiangamer25 on December 09, 2011, 03:23:25 PM
I'll attempt to kill speed, because I feel like no one else is trying to do so.*

* Edited to help get your message across since people ignore all caps. Try to keep the caps lock off Matt.
Andrew Wester (Ring Wraith), and Alex O both played last year with anti-speed decks (and Wraith pulled off third at nats).

They were anti-meta, not anti-speed. The basic premise was to be able to stop them even after they won the battle. However, it wouldn't have worked against Tim (hence why I played Disciples against him), and it didn't work against John, who had the fastest deck of the day.

TheHobbit13 · « **Reply #49 on:** December 09, 2011, 04:33:56 PM »

Nesfeder or Early?

News:

Author Topic: Feedback on Dom Cap (used in Nov/Dec ROOT) (Read 14918 times)

slugfencer

browarod

slugfencer

slugfencer

browarod

TheHobbit13

TheHobbit13

Warrior_Monk

TheHobbit13