Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Quote from: RedemptionAggie on September 16, 2017, 06:08:54 PMI think discard is the one exception to that because it can happen by game rule as opposed to just by abilities, but not sure.As of August last year, "Protected from discard" functions literally as "Protected from discard abilities" regardless of how it's worded, nothing protects from discard by game rule as a result of being defeated. Unless it's planned to revert to how it used to be prior to that in 5.0 (Which I would be 100% in support of), all play as for cards that say "protected from discard" should have "abilities" tacked on. It's a simple matter of me doing ctrl+f "from discard" although before I do that for the whole list it would be nice to have confirmation from Jordan which types of protection should be followed by "abilities" and which should not. Question for Jordan: If including "abilities" is the norm, are there any kinds of protection that specifically should not have "abilities" tacked on? It seems at least capture isn't supposed to have it but I'm curious as to why this is. Since they are all functionally identical should they not all be verbally identical for the sake of consistency?
I think discard is the one exception to that because it can happen by game rule as opposed to just by abilities, but not sure.
Samaritan Water Jar: "Discard this card to reveal and set aside the top 3 cards (or top 9 cards if a Samaritan Hero is in play, put Lost Souls in play instead) of an opponent's deck until that deck has no cards. On return, shuffle those cards." Stricken text is redundant with game rule.
QuoteSamaritan Water Jar: "Discard this card to reveal and set aside the top 3 cards (or top 9 cards if a Samaritan Hero is in play, put Lost Souls in play instead) of an opponent's deck until that deck has no cards. On return, shuffle those cards." Stricken text is redundant with game rule.That game rule is just for cards that are discarded from deck, not set aside, right?
I'm going to be meeting with Jordan tomorrow, can you send me a PM to remind me to check with him on that?
So does this mean David's Harp is considered as having "involves music" identifier?
For what purpose? I'm not aware of any cards that interact with an artifact that "involves music".