« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)  (Read 3808 times)

Offline SEB

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • *****
  • Posts: 356
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« on: June 27, 2018, 12:20:23 PM »
0
Text in question: "If blocked by a non-human, Hero may band..."

With the update of blocking: If I were to block with a human, then during normal init, play an EE to band in with Leviathan, would I then trigger Angelic Warrior's ongoing ability?
Logged
Check Out Redemption's Exahaustive Search tool:
Lexicon

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2018, 12:29:41 PM »
0
No, since there is already a character in battle, that does not trigger AW's band ability.

If you removed all the original blockers but your opponent used Gates of Hell to add a demon to battle, then it would trigger since there were no ECs already in battle.
Logged
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline SEB

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • *****
  • Posts: 356
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2018, 12:41:09 PM »
0
So Leviathan is not a "blocking" character?
Logged
Check Out Redemption's Exahaustive Search tool:
Lexicon

Offline NathanW

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2018, 12:57:48 PM »
+1
Quote from: SEB on June 27, 2018, 12:41:09 PM
So Leviathan is not a "blocking" character?

I can't quote the REG rn but there is a difference between a "blocking" evil character and a "block". Leviathan would be "blocking" but when it enters battle since there the first evil character already blocked Leviathan wouldn't count as a block.
Logged
(\__/) This is a bunny.
(='.'=) I know it's cute.
(")_(")

#CascadeDelendaEst

Offline SEB

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • *****
  • Posts: 356
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2018, 01:03:09 PM »
0
ok, i thought that was the case but making sure.

I remember the whole thing about a blocking evil character isnt blocking.
Logged
Check Out Redemption's Exahaustive Search tool:
Lexicon

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2018, 01:05:34 PM »
0
A "blocking" EC is "blocking" but it may not have "blocked."

#NotAlways100%Intuitive #WeKnow  ;)
Logged
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline SEB

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • *****
  • Posts: 356
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2018, 01:12:29 PM »
0
Quote from: The Guardian on June 27, 2018, 01:05:34 PM
A "blocking" EC is "blocking" but it may not have "blocked."

#NotAlways100%Intuitive #WeKnow  ;)

still want to upvote changing "blocking" to "defending"

#youAreStillLOVED
Logged
Check Out Redemption's Exahaustive Search tool:
Lexicon

Offline Kevinthedude

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1856
  • Yo
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Angelic Warrior (RoJ)
« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2018, 01:28:16 PM »
0
Quote from: SEB on June 27, 2018, 01:12:29 PM
Quote from: The Guardian on June 27, 2018, 01:05:34 PM
A "blocking" EC is "blocking" but it may not have "blocked."

#NotAlways100%Intuitive #WeKnow  ;)

still want to upvote changing "blocking" to "defending"

#youAreStillLOVED

I would agree if defending wasn't already taken to refer to the player who is being attacked.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal