Poll

Asahel vs Susanna

Asahel
Susanna

Author Topic: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)  (Read 3838 times)

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« on: March 30, 2014, 02:38:00 PM »
0
Red

2.   Asahel
5/4 Red (W/C)
May band to an O.T. warrior class human Hero or may choose opponent's male human Evil Character to block.  Protect Asahel from withdraw and return abilities.

Versus

White

2. Susanna
1/X White X = number of new testament female heroes in play
Look at the top X cards of deck.  May add one to hand.  Place the rest beneath deck.  Cannot be negated.

JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline AJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
  • #JarretSTUDham
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2014, 05:44:33 PM »
0
This is extremely hard for me but, I am going Susy. She is a card draw that can get around RBD and Iron Pan and she is also good for getting inish.
Its Stiddy Time

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2014, 10:27:56 PM »
0
Susanna is good, but she needs you to be playing with other NT females to work really well.  Also, white is just not strong enough anymore IMO.  While red may not be beastly, I like Asahel in this match up for the CTB.

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2014, 12:46:50 AM »
0
Without Susie, I think TGT drops from viable to irrelevant. She isn't the lynchpin that MMoJ is, but she's the grease in the cogs of TGT. Asahel is also the grease in the cogs of FBTNB, but I think that TGT edges out FBTNB, and I think Susie is more important a character in her respective theme than Asahel.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2014, 12:49:21 AM »
0
Without Susie, I think TGT drops from viable to irrelevant. She isn't the lynchpin that MMoJ is, but she's the grease in the cogs of TGT. Asahel is also the grease in the cogs of FBTNB, but I think that TGT edges out FBTNB, and I think Susie is more important a character in her respective theme than Asahel.

asahel has 3 ways of choosing a blocker to get inish and playing a card that becomes a cbn battle winner. granted 2 of those need david and ahimelek but what battle winners does suzy actually have besides HiR?
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2014, 01:03:45 AM »
0
what battle winners does suzy actually have besides HiR?

Magnificat, which you can play with the initiative (and doesn't affect Susanna since she is CBN).  You can also use No Need for Spices.  All are recurrable with Consider the Lillies.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2014, 02:16:59 AM »
0
what battle winners does suzy actually have besides HiR?

Magnificat, which you can play with the initiative (and doesn't affect Susanna since she is CBN).  You can also use No Need for Spices.  All are recurrable with Consider the Lillies.

if ur counting CtL the throw in a soldiers prayer for asahel . . . if u have suzy ur probably running tgt so if ignore isn't working for you then NNFS probably isn't gonna do you much good.  Magnifanct is another run of the mill enhancement not an cb anything. The upside to it is the lack of protection against set aside; still not cb(anything).   

Asahel is still better in my book
JMM is a modern day prophet

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2014, 02:28:06 AM »
+1
In my opinion, Asahel is more likely to make a rescue, but Susie is more likely to make a game-changing play.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2014, 02:39:55 AM »
+3
Susanna has fallen from favor for me for years now, as the only theme she fits into is TGT and more times than not the correct play is to send an actual TGT girl into the red zone. Coupled with an unimpressive number of spot removal or just relatively weak in general compared to other great spot removal in the meta, Asahel wins this matchup for being the far better utility character.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2014, 04:52:03 PM »
0
if ur counting CtL...

I was being thorough on the enhancements you can use, since it is not as common to know them all anymore and you expressed interest.

Susanna has fallen from favor for me for years now, as the only theme she fits into is TGT and more times than not the correct play is to send an actual TGT girl into the red zone.

This.  If she could use TGT it would be one thing, but she can't so this is pretty simple for me.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2014, 05:07:21 PM »
0
Choose the blocker/rescuer are very nice abilities, but I'll take Susie's Soul-hiding ability over that any day. She also gets better initiative and isn't, by default, vulnerable to CBN Scattered (like Asahel is if you use his band). I also feel that the theme Susanna fits in is a better theme overall than any that Asahel fits into. No she can't use TGT, but I daresay she's the best tutor in the game, especially since she gets around protection from search/draw/reveal by being a "look at."

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2014, 05:24:26 PM »
0
She also gets better initiative and isn't, by default, vulnerable to CBN Scattered (like Asahel is if you use his band).

Asahel is not by default vulnerable to Scattered.  If you actually want to win with CTB, you are choosing and playing a CBN battle-winner with initiative.

Speaking of which, initiative is much better for Asahel when you choose who he fights, as opposed to Susanna with a variable toughness (which gets worse the better her ability becomes) and no choice over who she fights.

I also feel that the theme Susanna fits in is a better theme overall than any that Asahel fits into. No she can't use TGT

Then she doesn't fit into the theme.  Asahel fits into Red about as perfectly as possible: You can choose to band (which is what Red does) or choose the blocker and play CBN david-related stuff (also what Red does).  Not sure how he doesn't fit, that's just silly.  Susanna, on the other hand, cannot use the best card in her theme, or be part of the big-bad-band.  This point is clearly reversed.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2014, 05:32:06 PM »
+1
The point isn't reversed, you just misunderstood what I said. :P

What I meant was that the theme Susanna fits into (TGT/NT Women) is better overall than the theme Asahel fits into (Red/WC), I wasn't referring to how well each fits into their respective themes.

Regarding your second paragraph, her toughness may be variable but she still only has 1 strength so the only ECs who would get non-special ability initiative blocking her would be the 1/1 evil Kings (or Babylonian Soldiers if you have no captured characters in play).

Regarding Scattered, I specifically mentioned that he's vulnerable if you use his band. Obviously he wouldn't have a problem with Scattered if you use his CtB, lol. There's still the potential there, though, whereas Susie doesn't have that particular weakness.

Offline AJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
  • #JarretSTUDham
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2014, 05:43:00 PM »
0
Asahel would be better if he was in a better color. As much as I love red, white right now is better I am not voting for Suzy just because of her color mind you, I am voting for her because she has a very useful ability in addition to a good theme.
Its Stiddy Time

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2014, 05:47:54 PM »
0
What I meant was that the theme Susanna fits into (TGT/NT Women) is better overall than the theme Asahel fits into (Red/WC), I wasn't referring to how well each fits into their respective themes.

I would still disagree with you there.  TGT is powerful, and she doesn't fit into the PBI part of it.  If you are using TGT, and not going in with a TGT hero, then something else is going on.  If you just use NT women in general, you are split across white/gold.

Regarding Scattered, I specifically mentioned that he's vulnerable if you use his band. Obviously he wouldn't have a problem with Scattered if you use his CtB, lol. There's still the potential there, though, whereas Susie doesn't have that particular weakness.

If banding is defeated by the advent of a single card (which you can only have one of, regard of what type you play), then why is banding still used in the meta, and in most top decks?  I don't accept that as a 'weakness', especially when you have CTB as an option.

I don't say that AutO is weaker than <insert random character> because his optional draw can hurt you if you choose to use it and RBD is up.  That's not a valid argument in the first place, but he still has exchange otherwise which is powerful enough.

Finally, your exact words were "by default," as if you would "by default" be banding with him.  I don't accept that as a valid assumption to make in this situation, and given all the above, this is certainly no 'weakness'.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2014, 06:02:08 PM »
0
Fir your first paragraph: Again, I'm not debating how well she fits into her theme, but TGT is far and away better than Red. You, personally, may build a white-focused TGT offense without Susanna (and you're perfectly allowed to have that opinion, just as I am allowed to have mine) but I think most people would build their white-focused TGT offense with her. (I specify white-focused because TGT Disciples with mono-purple, or at least purple and not white, is also a popular build)

For your last 3 paragraphs: I really don't feel like getting into a debate about wording, lol. If you really want to pick apart my opinion (never claimed it was fact) at the word or clause level be my guest but I'm not going to debate semantics with you about a popularity contest. :P

Offline AJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
  • #JarretSTUDham
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2014, 06:05:37 PM »
-1


For your last 3 paragraphs: I really don't feel like getting into a debate about wording, lol. If you really want to pick apart my opinion (never claimed it was fact) at the word or clause level be my guest but I'm not going to debate semantics with you about a popularity contest. :P

 +1 with this lets all remember we're on the forum for Gods game. :angel:
Its Stiddy Time

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2014, 06:36:56 PM »
0
Not sure where you two get the idea that I am attacking anyone  :o  You are way off base if that is where you go with my statements.

I don't quite get why you having an opinion (which I also didn't say was a fact...in fact, I think I was trying to prove it was everything but :P) means that I cannot counter specific points.  We are debating over who the best hero is, and I can give just as much of my opinions as you ;)  If I disagree with you, I don't see how there is an issue with having a discussion on the actual difference between our viewpoints.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2014, 07:17:04 PM »
-2
I don't think you're attacking me, but I also don't feel like defending my opinion in a popularity contest (which is all this is, there's no requirement of fact or irrefutable evidence) when you're sitting there picking it apart into pieces. :P

I prefer Susanna for certain reasons, you prefer Asahel for other reasons, there's no reason we can't both be "right" or "correct," it basically just means we have different playstyles (as everyone does). I dunno why everything has to become a debate with you. ;)

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #19 on: March 31, 2014, 07:41:08 PM »
+1
I dunno why everything has to become a debate with you. ;)

*sigh* This type of thing gets a little old, frankly.

First, I'll say most of my post is pointed at AJ, who seems to be implying that I'm not in the proper spirit for being on a forum for a game for God.  AJ, if that's not what you meant, it is how it came across, and it is very far from the truth, as I said.

"Why are you arguing?" or "Why does everything become a debate?" is not a good way to have a conversation, because it is a loaded question with no 'proper' answer.  Let me try, though.  I respond because we are continuing a discussion, as in it takes two to tango.  I enjoy discussions on things like this, and it is the purpose of this 'contest', to debate the best hero.  If you and I are having a discussion, and you post something to counter my points, I will respond to you, and that should not be a problem.  I really don't understand why that becomes a problem around here.

There's no reason that you have to post in response, but if you do, don't expect me to just suddenly stop the conversation on that note for no apparent reason.  In the post where you said you didn't want to debate...you debated beforehand ;)  So you can see my confusion, and why I respond to you.

Now, if you really don't want to keep debating these characters, that's fine, I don't take that personally just like I don't take any debate personally.  I'd just appreciate it if you, and AJ, would see my post for what it was: a continuing discussion without anything personal in it.  If you read more into it than that, then that is upsetting.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #20 on: March 31, 2014, 07:47:20 PM »
+1
Debate is fun and part of this competition but sometimes it can feel overwhelming when a post is critiqued at a deep analytical level while originally it had 30 seconds of thought put into its wording. I see both sides but sometimes less is more and an unsaid word goes further for those of us who analyze data and information in a way similar to redoubter.

Less can be more
JMM is a modern day prophet

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #21 on: March 31, 2014, 08:54:51 PM »
0
jbeers hit it on the head. I came here to throw my vote for Susie and explain why I chose her only to have my thoughts picked apart because of word choice and/or misunderstandings.

In the post where you said you didn't want to debate...you debated beforehand ;)  So you can see my confusion, and why I respond to you.
And this kind of proves the point I said above. I never said I didn't want to debate, I only ever said I don't want to debate when you're sitting there picking apart what I said and pointing out words or clauses. Save the technical arguing for Ruling Questions. :P

EDIT: I guess I should realize by now that you argue technically, so that's prolly my fault. I do apologize for thinking you were being especially harsh, I realize now that I should have given the benefit of the doubt.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 09:01:33 PM by browarod »

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #22 on: March 31, 2014, 09:40:00 PM »
0
EDIT: I guess I should realize by now that you argue technically, so that's prolly my fault. I do apologize for thinking you were being especially harsh, I realize now that I should have given the benefit of the doubt.

For the record, I feel that one card being better than the other should be argued from a technical perspective...but then maybe I'm just getting too technical about the approach  ;D
Hope I don't need to say that I'm joking on this one, but just in case.

Sorry for my part in it.  I hope you understand what I am saying, and that's all that matters.

Offline TheJaylor

  • Trade Count: (+18)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3121
  • Fortress Alstad
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Redemption with Jayden
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #23 on: March 31, 2014, 10:41:26 PM »
+1
So...... Suzie.

Offline AJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
  • #JarretSTUDham
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rd 4. (Red 2. Asahel Versus White 2. Susanna)
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2014, 08:14:38 AM »
0




First, I'll say most of my post is pointed at AJ, who seems to be implying that I'm not in the proper spirit for being on a forum for a game for God.

Sorry I was not really being serious.
Its Stiddy Time

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal