How can we stand behind a March Madness tournament with only 64 teams when the precedent has clearly been set by a certain governing body that a sum of 2 more teams is clearly more appealing to the masses and more useful for determining a winner.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6c85/f6c8589d33180d465202e6e741fc2653f6435191" alt="Roll Eyes ::)"
Better yet shoot for 96...
Kirk